Festschrift on the Anniversary of the Roman Empire, 16 January 27 BC. 
Preface.
Judas H blogging Priest, who writes a blog post THIS long then calls it a Festschrift and starts it with a Preface?
A  little explanation then.  This   post first appeared  on 1 September 2007.   It became the most   consistently hit page on this blog.  As time went on I posted material  related to it in "A Wonder of the World and  Forest  Fires" on 27  August 2007, "25  July A.D. 306 in Eboracum,    Britannia" on 25 July  2008, and "More  Twelve Days of Christmas, 2008"   on  27 December 2008.  And there was  more stuff not included in any of   the four.  So, in 2009 this post  appeared as an entirely new  entity,   consisting of the new material  and  material rewritten  from the four   earlier posts, within the  structure   of the original Eastern/Western   post, and published on 16  January, the date of the founding of the Roman Empire. For 2010,  additional new material on the current state of the old secular   powers  was included.  For 2011, the post was   expanded yet again within the  original format, to include related   material from posts on Jerome,  Augustine, and Boethius and their times   that I posted in 2010.  The  2012 and 2013 versions have only slight revisions, mostly updates on "where are  they now".
Introduction.
This is then the keynote post, as it were, of this entire blog.  Long as it is, this post demonstrated a simple point.
Which    is, what we have in Western Christianity is simply the continuation  of    the state religion of the Western Roman Empire and in Eastern     Christianity the continuation of the state religion of the Eastern Roman     Empire. Both of them the continuation of the state church created  mutually by   both halves of the Roman Empire in the Edict of  Thessalonica in 380.    The reformation of the faith and church to its  true self would  then   need to happen outside the former empire, which  it did in the  Lutheran   Reformation, originating in Germany, restoring  the faith and church of   Jesus Christ from its "Babylonian Captivity"  while retaining those  later  developments that do not contradict the  Gospel, and not mistaking  some  of the former for the latter and  rejecting them, as did the later   Reformation.
This post will examine this development in fifteen sections.
I. The Founding of the Roman Empire on 16 January, 27 BC.
II. Diocletian Splits the Empire into East and West, July 285.
III. Constantine, 306.
IV. Constantine is Emperor both East and West, 325,
V. Theodosius, Last Emperor East and West, Opens New State Religion, 380.
VI.  Who Is Damasus?
VII.  The New State Religion, The Catholic Church, Tries To Shore Things Up.  Jerome.
VIII.  Elsewhere in 380, The New Church Gets A New Guy Named Gus.
IX. Theodosius, Last Emperor East and West, Closes Old State Religion, 392/3.
X. Western Empire Collapses in 476, Eastern Empire Continues to 1453.
XI. West Makes Comeback As Holy Roman Empire, 800, Lasts Until 1806.
XII.  Successor Empires East And West Last Until World War I.
XIII.  Where Are They Now?
XIV.  Summation nostra aetate, In Our Time.
XV. Conclusion.
I. The Founding of the Roman Empire on 16 January, 27 BC.
Rome     was founded from early settlements on 21 April 753 BC by the twin     brothers Romulus (hence the name) and Remus. Romulus was the first of     seven kings, the remaining six being elected. He divided the men into     those fit for military service and those not, then from those not     established the Senate as an advisory council of 300 men, 100 from each     of the three Roman tribes, the Ramnes or Latins, the Tities or   Sabines,   and the Luceres or Etruscans, from the best men as he saw it.   The word   senate comes from the same root as senile, btw, meaning old   man, take   that as you will, and he called its members patres,  fathers,  their   descendants being patricians. He also established a  legislative  body,   the Comitia Curiata. If you're hearing modern  English words  committee  and  curia, you're right: it literally means a  co-meeting of  an assembly  of  men. There were 30 curiae, 10 for each  tribe. The  Senate proposed  the  new king to the Comitia Curiata, then  the people  voted and if  successful  the candidate would be determined  by an augur  to see if it  was God's  will, and if so he would then ask  the Curia to  grant him  imperium, rule.  The new king (rex) was pretty  much  everything -- top  executive,  lawmaker, judge, and king of sacred  rites  or rex sacrorum.
In  510  BC, the Senate and people of  Rome  changed this and established Res   publica romana, the Roman  Republic.  The Senate governed, and the  king's  power was split, held  by two  consules (singular, consul) for a  one year  term, and the rex  sacrorum  as well as other chief priests and  the  virgins of Vesta were  run by a  new office, pontifex maximus, the  supreme  bridge builder  literally,  and in emergencies a dictator could  be chosen  for a six  month term.  Yes, there's still a pontifex maximus  in Rome.
Some   consider  the Roman Empire to have begun with  Julius Caesar's   appointment by the  Senate as dictator in perpetuity in  44 BC. Julius   accepted this  position in the Temple of Venus Genetrix,  and the  denarius  was minted  with his image and "dictator perpetuus" on  one  side and the  goddess  Ceres -- goddess of growth, agriculture and   maternal love, the  Roman  version of the Greek Demeter -- and the title   "augur pontifex   maximus", high priest of the college of pontiffs,  the  highest position   in the Roman religion, on the other. He did not  rise  to accept his   position, and Senators fearful that he would make  himself  king   assassinated him in the Senate on the Ides, aka the  15th, of  March 44   BC.
Others consider the Roman Empire to have  begun 2  September  31  BC when Octavian defeated his rival Marc Antony  and his  ally  Cleopatra  of Egypt at the naval Battle of Actium in the  Ionian  Sea,  and also  ordered the execution of Cleopatra's son  Caesarion, who  was  17 and was  held to be, and very likely was, the  son of Cleopatra  and  Julius Caesar,  though Julius had named Octavian,  actually his grand   nephew, his son and heir.
Others  yet, and  these are the guys   who are right, consider the Empire to have  begun  with the Senate giving   Octavius, or Octavian, the title augustus   (honoured, or august, one)   on 16 January 27 BC. With any rival  claimants  dead by suicide,   execution or military defeat, Caesar  Augustus,  Octavian, was the   undisputed ruler, and became pontifex  maximus in 13  BC. And the rest is   history, as they say.
Caesar  Augustus was the  first real Roman   Emperor, though for some time the  facade of the Roman  Republic   continued. Despite frontier fighting  with those outside the  Empire, the   Empire itself enjoyed a peace, the  pax augustana or pax  romana, that   would last from 27 BC to 180 AD,  attaining its greatest  extent under   the emperor Trajan (98-117).
But  by the third  century, things   became unworkable. The sheer size of  the empire, the  lack of any clear   method of succession of power, and  consequently  frequent civil war,  and  the inability of the military to  preserve  internal order since  they  were concentrated on the borders  to preserve  external order,  which in  turn became impossible to  maintain against  invaders, about  destroyed  the empire.
II. Diocletian Splits the Empire into East and West, July 285.
Diocletian     put a band aid on things, and in July 285 in Milan, then called     Mediolanum, split the Empire in two, making his friend and fellow general     officer Maximian first as "Caesar" of the West, then on 1 April 286     Maximus as "Augustus" of the Western half too, and Diocletian  remained  "Augustus" of the Eastern part. Diocletian set up Nicomedia, in modern     Turkey, as the Eastern Roman capital in 286, and Milan as the Western     Roman capital in 293, though Maximian largely ruled from Trier, then     called Augusta Treverorum, in modern Germany. However, Maximian  would    commit suicide on Constantine's (we'll get to him) orders, and    Diocletian it seems committed  suicide over that, so retirement wasn't  so   good.
Diocletian also  considered the expansion of  Christianity a   threat to the state and  launched possibly the most  violent   persecutions in history, certainly the  most violent since  Nero.
The   arrangement yielded no new pax  romana, although the  persecutions  would  end with Galerius in 311. The  underlying problems  remained.  Running  such a far flung empire would be a  big job to-day,  but then  there was  no Internet, no TV, no radio, no  phones, no air  travel, no  railroads,  no motor vehicles, etc. The split  of the empire  to manage  it better  resulted in an arrangement called the  Tetrarchy:  each half  would have  its Augustus, with a Caesar as an  assistant.  Diocletian was  the last  Emperor of an undivided Roman Empire.  Going  forward,  Diocletian was  Augustus in the East, with Galerius the   Caesar, and  Maximian was  Augustus in the West, with a guy named   Constantius the  Caesar.
On  1 May 305, Diocletian and Maximian   retired as  Emperors simultaneously  in Milan and Nicomedia -- the first   to leave  power voluntarily. This  left the Caesars to become the  Augusti,   Galerius ruling the East and  Constantius ruling the West.
Now,    this Constantius had this wife  Helena. Well, maybe. I mean, he had  this   Helena, but whether she was  wife or concubine is not documented.   Anyway,  they had this son in 272  and he was named Constantine. But,  in  293 when  Diocletian named  Constantius as Western Caesar, part of  the  deal was he  divorce Helena  and marry Theodora, the step-daughter  of  Maximian, the  Augustus whose  Caesar he was to be. Which he did.  Helena  did not remarry  and lived  afterward in obscurity, though her  son  Constantine was very  devoted to  her, and also wanted to become  Caesar,  but a military officer  named  Severus got the nod instead at  the  insistence of Galerius, the  Eastern  Augustus.
III. Constantine, 306.
Constantine     served with his father's military campaigns in England, where he was     trying to solve part of the mess described above, which historians   call   the Third Century Crisis. Their base of operations was a town   called   Eboracum.
Eboracum was the name of a city founded by the   Romans   in AD 71 in England. The Romans began conquering what is now   England in   AD 43. A group called the Brigantes originally  collaborated  with the   Romans but became more troublesome and  eventually the Roman  Ninth Legion   under General Quintus Petillius  Cerialis was sent to put  and keep them   in order. This accomplished, a  fort was established and  given a   Latinised version of the native  Celtic name for the place,  "field of yew   trees". General Cerialis was  named Governor of Britain  by Roman  Emperor  Vespasian, who ruled from  69 until he died in 79, and  was  himself a  distinguished military  officer and had participated in  the  original  Roman invasion in 43.  Eboracum was a centre of Roman  power in  England  for some time to  come.
When Constantius died  there on 25  July  306, his army  immediately proclaimed Constantine his  son  Augustus, but,  Galerius  said Severus had the job. Constantine  notified  Galerius, and  Galerius  got so mad he about burned the  portrait  Constantine had sent.  In the  end, he gave him the title  Caesar, not  Augustus, which still went  to  Severus.
Constantine  conquered his  way back toward Rome,   showing an ever more clear disgust  for the  "barbarians" beyond the   Empire's frontiers. In Rome he was  put down as  the son of a harlot, a   reference to Helena's unclear  status, and  Maxentius, son of Maximian,   claimed the title Emperor.  Maximian  proposed a deal -- his daughter   Fausta would be Constantine's  wife,  though he already had one, but  hey,  and he gets the title  Augustus and  will lay off Maxentius.
Constantine   took the deal,  dumped his  wife and married Fausta in Augusta  Treverorum  (Trier) in  307. The next  year Galerius was so concerned  about the  West's  inability to settle  down that he called a council  with himself,   Maximian and the retired  Diocletian, whose compromises  no-body  accepted.  By 310 Maximian was in  open revolt, said  Constantine was  dead, took  back the royal purple, but  the army  remained true to  Constantine, who  was of course very much  alive. In  July 310, captured  at Massilia (now  Marseille, France),  Maximian  hanged himself. At first  Constantine said  it was a personal  tragedy,  but then said it was the  result of a  conspiracy to kill him  and he  was offered suicide rather  than be tried  and executed, then  issued a  damnatio memoriae, a  damnation of memory,  sort of the original   airbrushing out of the  photos, where all coins,  statues, inscriptions   etc with a person's  name were defaced or  destroyed, against him.
When   Diocletian,  in retirement in a  palace he had built in his native   Dioclea (hence  his name) near Salona,  Dalmatia (modern Split,  Croatia),  heard of this  he went into a deep  despondency, and seeing  the  Tetrarchy once hailed  as bringing order to  the whole world in  ruins  through the actions of  Constantine and his  longtime friend and   colleague Maximian dead, he  died on 3 December 311,  most likely by   suicide too. So retirement  didn't work out too well for  either retired   emperor.
This  though left Constantine without the  prop of   legitimacy through  Maximian, whose son Maxentius was ready to  take up   the fight, and on  25 July Constantine began to appeal to a  supposed   ancestry and a  vision from Apollo as the authority for his rule  rather   than the  tetrarchy and councils. Constantine won over Maxentius'   forces   throughout Italy and took Rome.
Constantine went to   Milan, the   Western Roman capital, to forge an alliance with the new  guy  in the   East, Licinius. That was the marriage of Constantine's  sister to    Licinius. Supposedly this meeting is the origin of the  Edict of Milan,    granting tolerance to Christianity. Actually, it  wasn't an edict,  wasn't   from Milan and wasn't the granting of  tolerance. Galerius had  done  that  just before his death in 311, and  the Edict of Milan is  actually a   letter to the governor of Bithynia, a  Roman province in  what is now   Turkey containing a town named Nicaea,  by Licinius  granting tolerance to   all religions and restoration to  Christians of  property taken from  them  during persecutions, and  signed by both  emperors. The "Edict" was  more  of a middle ground from  tolerance per  se into a favoured status  with  special provisions for  Christians,  leading to the eventual  proclamation  of Christianity as  the state  religion.
But the  alliance fell  apart. War broke out  between  the two, Constantine in the  West and  Licinius in the East,  and by 320  Licinius began persecuting  Christians  again, allied with  Goths of the  native pagan religions, and  by 324 full  scale civil war  was underway.  Constantine's forces won,  sporting a  symbol said to  have been revealed  to him, the labarum, or  chi-rho.  Licinius  surrendered, on a deal that  his life be spared, but  Constantine  had  him killed the next year  anyway.
IV. Constantine is Emperor both East and West, 325.
That     next year, 325, was a big one. From that point on, Constantine was   the   emperor both West and East. He began to rebuild Byzantium, close   by   Nicomedia, as the second or New Rome (Nova Roma), later renaming it     Constantinople, Constantinopolis actually, meaning Constantine's   City,   imagine that. The ceremony of dedication on 11 May 330 was   partly   Christian and partly pagan -- and you thought Yankee Stadium   was   syncretism! He also, though not a bishop, not a priest, not even a     baptised Christian, called a church council to settle correct   theology   about Jesus against primarily the Arians. Well, it just might   have  helped him politically to have one religion for his realm too.    You get  to do that when you  rule your known world.
To top  that,  next  year in 326 he did  something even more amazing than  calling a  council  of the Christian  church when you're not a Christian  -- that  is, if you  believe Baptism is  a means of grace uniting one  to the life  of Christ  rather than through a  personal decision --  namely, he had  his son and  wife killed, with his  mother's prodding.  Exactly what that  was all  about will probably never  be known, but it  was one of two  things.  Supposedly Fausta his wife was  raped by  Crispus his son (how   classically Greek) or the two were having  an  affair, and either he   discovered this and had them both killed, or,   Fausta lied that it   happened to keep Crispus, who was not her son,  from  being named emperor   over her sons, he believed it and had his  son  killed, then found out   she lied and had her killed. Either way,  wow.
Days  Of Our Lives   and then some more. Crispus was the son  of Constantine and  his wife   Minervina, whom Constantine divorced to  marry Fausta to  get on with his   upward career mobility. And here's  Helena his mother,  who got dumped   by gramps Constantius for exactly  the same reason. How  bizarre is  that?  Fausta won though -- Crispus  was executed but her three  sons all   became Roman emperors. Oddly,  none of them revoked the  damnatio   memoriae of her enacted by  Constantine. At any rate, the whole  thing   changed Constantine  forever, and he never set foot in the Western    Empire again.
So  he who was first proclaimed emperor in a far    flung northwest outpost  of the Western Empire by an authority that had    no authority to do  it, the army, ends up solidifying the Roman Empire  in   the East as the  West slowly crumbles. By 337 Constantine was  wearing   out from being  Great and all, and he finally sought Baptism on  22 May  just  before he  died, from not one of the victorious  Trinitarians at the   Council of  Nicaea he called, but from Bishop  Eusebius of Nicomedia,  long  a court  favourite despite a brief exile  and chief apologist for  Arius.   Really. I'm not making this up.
Not  to mention  Constantine   retained the title pontifex maximus, the title  of Roman  emperors as  head  of the pre-Christian Roman pagan state  religion  priesthood.  Maybe  that's why there's no pope in the East.  Well,  actually there  are "popes"  in the East, but in the pontifex  sense, not  in the  pontifex maximus  sense of the one in Rome. After  Constantine's  death,  the Western Empire  was split between two of his  sons, and the  East  went to his middle son,  all three having variants  of his name.   Constant power struggle from  within and invasions from  without   destabilised everything.
Eventually,  a Spanish military  officer   in the Roman army named Theodosius became  Augustus/Emperor in  the  East  in August 378 by Gratian the Western  Emperor after Valens  the  Eastern  Emperor was killed in battle.  Later, when  Valentinian II,   the  remaining Western ruler, was found hanged on 15 May  392 -- the   preacher  at his funeral in the Western capital Milan, the  bishop   thereof, who  had been its territorial governor before he changed jobs,   Ambrose, as in  "Saint" Ambrose, steering clear of  whether it was   murder or suicide --  he became Emperor of both East and  West, the last   to do that.  But  we're getting ahead of ourselves.
V. Theodosius, Last Emperor East and West, Opens A New State Religion, 380. 
While     the end of the persecutions was welcome per se, the favoured status   of   Christianity also transformed the religion from one for whose  truth   one  would rather die than betray to a religion one joined for   political  and  social gain. The transformation of Christianity's status   was  complete on 27 February 380, when the  Eastern Emperor  Theodosius,  in  concert with  his Western co-Emperor  counterparts  Gratian and   Valentinian II, issued  the Edict of  Thessalonica, which  declared that   Nicene Christianity is the official  state religion  of  the Roman  Empire  overall, that all subjects of the  Empire must hold   this faith  as  delivered from the Apostles to Rome and preserved by  then  current  Pope   Damasus I and then current Bishop of Alexandria  Peter,  that  these  alone  shall be called "Catholic Christians",  because they alone  would  be of the catholic, meaning universal,  faith  of the  Empire, and  that  all others are heretics and not even  churches,  subject to  such   punishment as the Empire should choose to  visit upon  them.  He deposed   some bishops and appointed others in the  new state  religion,  and  ended  state subsidy for the former state  religion. Goodbye my  kingdom  is not  of this world, hello apostolic  succession in communion with the  Roman  state pope.  Goodbye catholic  church, hello Catholic Church.
VI.  Who Is Damasus?
So    who's this Damasus dude in Rome?  Man, papal elections just ain't    what  they used to be.  Twice over  actually.  Once upon a time, they   were  a  matter of the clergy and  people of the area choosing a bishop,   or   overseer, with overseers from  nearby areas confirming it.  But  by  this   time we have Constantine, and  Christianity attaining   respectable   state-recognised status, and the  Emperor confirmed newly   elected   bishops.  That's helpful because  sometimes more than one guy   claimed to   be elected, sometimes in more  than one election!
That's   what  happened with Damasus.  When Pope  Liberius, whom the Emperor     Constantine had thrown out of Rome, died on  24 September 366, one     faction supported Ursinus, the previous pope's  deacon, while another,     which had previously supported a rival pope,  Felix II, supported     Damasus.  The patrician class, the old noble  families of Rome,     supported Damasus, but the plebian class, the regular  folks, and the     deacons supported Ursinus.  Each was elected, in separate  elections.      Some real apostolic succession there, oh yeah.
It  gets worse.      There was outright rioting between supporters of the two,  each  side    killing the other, so bad that the prefects of the city had to   be    called on to restore order.  Damasus got formally recognised, and   then    his supporters commenced a slaughter of 137 of Ursinus'  supporters,     right in a church.  Damasus was accused of murder, and  hauled up on     charges before a later prefect, but, being the  favourite of the wealthy     class, they bought the support of the  Emperor and got Damasus off.     He   was known as Auriscalpius  Matronarum, the ladies' ear scratcher.
Damasus     was "pope"  from 366 until he died on 11 December 384.  It was during   this  "papacy", we have to remember to really get what was going on  here,   the   Emperors East and West made the church as headed by  Damasus, and   Peter   in Antioch, the official state church and the one  recognised  as    "catholic", in the Edict of Thessalonica on 27 February  380.   That  date, and not the words "tu es Petrus" in the Gospel, not   Pentecost, or  any sort of succession from the Apostles but simply from   the Roman  Empire, is the   birthday of the Catholic Church, as  distinct  from the  catholic church.    It was also during Damasus'  papacy that  the Emperor  Gratian. one of the   signatories to the Edict  of  Thessalonica, refused  the traditional title   of pontifex maximus,   which then became  associated with the bishop of   Rome as the chief   priest of the Roman  state religion.  In sum, this is   the era of the   beginning of the  Babylonian Captivity of the Church   (Babylon of   course being a figure  for Rome).
VII.  The New State Religion, The Catholic Church, Tries To Shore Things Up.  Jerome.
In    382, Damasus called a guy named Jerome back to Rome to help him shape     things up.  What was  being shaped up was the new Catholic Church,   which   by Imperial edict was  now the only church entitled to the name,   all  others  being heretics and  deserving of such punishment as the   Empire  should  choose to inflict and  this "Catholic Church" the   official state   religion.  The Western Roman  Empire was falling apart   and just  decades away from going under, so, as with Constantine, a lot   of this  was politically motivated and had to  do with staving that  off.
So   who's this Jerome dude?  Jerome was born a pagan in a  town called    Stridon, which was in the  Roman territory called  Dalmatia.  The town no    longer exists because the  Goths trashed it in  379, and no-body knows    exactly where it was,  except that it was in  Dalmatia, which was more   or  less modern Croatia  and Bosnia and  Slovenia.  As a young man he   went to  Rome to pursue  classical  education, and by his own account   pursue the  various   extra-curricular activities often found in student   life then as  now.    Somewhere along the line he converted to   Christianity and was   baptised.
After  some years in Rome he set   out for France,  well,  Gaul, and ended up in  Trier.  Man, everything   happens in  Trier, which is about the most magnificent and  enchanting   place it  has  been my good fortune to visit, ever, anywhere.   Just the   place  itself blew me away when I was there and I didn't know even half   of  this stuff then.  Anyway, here in this most  wonderful place Jerome    seems to have taken up theology.   Then about 373 or  so he sets out   for  what is now called the Middle East,  particularly  Antioch, in what   is  now Turkey and one of the oldest  centres of  Christianity.  It  was   there that he came to give up secular  learning  altogether and  focus  on  the Bible, learning Hebrew from Jewish   Christians, and,  apparently   seized with remorse for his past behaviour,   got into all  sorts of   ascetic penitential practices.  Always a danger  --  the Good  News just   isn't news enough, gotta have works in there to really be  forgiven and   saved!
But in  382 he goes back to Rome again,  this time as   assistant to Pope Damasus  I.  Jerome was no slouch at  matronly ear    tickling himself, and once back  soon had a little group  of wealthy    patrician widows around him, whose  money supported him, a  Paula in    particular.  And he had this ascetic  works-righteousness  thing going,    into which he got them all.  Nothing  like having lots  of someone  else's   money to support you if you want a  monastic  ascetic life.   Hell yes.
In   fact, the daughter of  Paula, a  lively young woman  named Blaesilla,   after just four months of  having  to live this way,  died!  Yeah, died.    On top of which Jerome  tells  Paula not to mourn  her daughter.  This  got  the Romans really  pissed,  there was an  inquiry into just what was  really  going on between   Jerome and Paula,  and then when Damasus died  in 384, with that   support gone,  Jerome was  forced out of Rome!
So  where's he go?    Where else, the   Eastern Empire, where they really get  into all  this  monkery and   fasting and stuff.  Paula and her money  follow.   The whole  sham of a   works based sparse life funded by  patrician  wealthy-class  money.    There's some real apostolic stuff for  you.   Lemme tell ya, if  somebody   wants to convince you of their  mistaking  the physiological  effects  of  self induced glucose denial for  some  sort of spiritual state  of   attainment, you'd be better off  running  right to the nearest   McDonald's  and ordering a double quarter   pounder, which, if memory   serves, is  combo 4 on the menu.  Personally  I  like Burger King or  Arby's  or our  Nebraska favourite Runza  better.
This  sort of  stuff is  not  self-denial, it's life  denial.  Utterly  pathological.   It is no curb   whatever to excess and  greed, but rather  an equally  odious extreme   reaction to it, both  extremes equally devoid  of the  Gospel altogether.    It comes rather  from an empire about to  collapse  under the tension of   its classic  past and Christian present  and  efforts to reconcile them   from  within, with huge civil unrest in  its  wake, and threats from without  in   the West.  Which was bad enough,   but in the East, which did not    collapse for another thousand years or   so, this nonsense continued  unabated, which   is equally bad.  The   opposite of greed and excess is  not this   pathological repression, but   Judas H Priest, just eat a  normal balanced   diet and go about a life  of  use to God and your  fellow Man, stay in  your  parish where you find   everything that made  the saints saints, the  Word,  the Word preached,   the Sacrament, and  your fellow Christians.
VIII.  Elsewhere in 380, The New Church Gets A New Guy Named Gus.
A     Roman citizen, from what are now called Berbers, named Augustine is      teaching in Carthage in 380, seven years away from being baptised by   the    state bishop, Ambrose, of the state church in the state's  Western     capital by then, Milan.  Remember, Emperor Diocletian, the  last of  an  undivided   Roman Empire, had made Milan, then called  Mediolanum,  the  Western   capital in 293 and Nicomedia, now Izmit  Turkey, the  Eastern  capital in   286.  And, btw, called his new  provincial units  diocese,  after himself.    A secular unit, not a  church one, and the  modern  church diocese is but an echo of the  religious part of the Roman   Imperial state unit.
Constantine  moved the Eastern capital to   Byzantium, renamed it   Constantinople,  which is now Istanbul Turkey.    The Roman Senate,   however, still in  Rome, was not shall we say   comfortable with this new state   religion  in the two capitals of the   Empire, and lots of academic   disputes and  apologetics on both sides   went back and forth, but no   violence.   During this unsettled time   Augustine gets appointed to the   most  prestigious professorship in his   world, at the Western capital   Milan  in 384, and is all caught up in   the swirling controversy between    the old state religion and classic   philosophy and the new state  Catholic Church, just four years old.
He     also gets caught up  in his mother Monica's designs for his career.     Now  with a  prestigious academic position, his longstanding  relationship    with a  woman he never names but called "the one", of  some 14 years    complete  with son, called Adeodatus, meaning "given by  God", hasta go     according to mom.  So he caves and sends her away, she  saying she will     never be with another man, he finding a new  concubine to tide him  over    until the proper social marriage his mom,  "Saint" Monica,  arranges  with a   then 11 year old girl, can happen.   I'm not making  this up!
And  about concubines.  Ain't   what you  think.  A  concubine in ancient Rome  was simply a wife that   Roman law  forbade  you to marry due to your or  her social class.  These    marriages  denied legality by Imperial law  were rather common, and the    church  didn't come down on them since it  wasn't the couple's fault  they    weren't legally married.  Something to  keep in mind when "the  one"  gets   called concubine in the modern sense,  their relationship  passed  off as   merely lustful, and the son as  "illegitimate".
No   wonder the  dude  was confused!  His whole  world swirling in unsettled   controversy  and  mom's running his life  like a beauty pageant mom.    And then, as he's  all  upset about his  life, he has this really weird    experience where he   hears a kid's  voice saying "Take, read" (the   famous  tolle, lege).   Now  what he was  told to take and read you   won't likely  find in your  local  Christian  bookstore, but was among   the most widely  read books,  first in  the  Imperial Christian state   church and then  through the  Middle Ages,   being a Life of St Anthony   of the Desert,  written by St  Athanasius   about 360, the original in   Greek but best known in a  Latin  translation  made  about ten or so   years later.
Hoo-boy, old Tony.   He was a   wealthy Egyptian who   became Christian at  about age 34, so  far so  good,  sold everything   and took up with a local  hermit.  Tony in  NO  way was  the "Founder  of  Monasticism", as religious  hermits of  various  religions  were  common  on the outskirts of cities;  Philo the   Jewish-Egyptian  writer   mentions them all, sharing the Platonic  idea of   having to get  out  of  the world to get into an ideal.  Pure  Platonist   Idealism.  Sure    glad Jesus didn't do that or let his Apostles  do it   either when they    wanted to, but went back to Jerusalem where real   life  had things  for   them to do.
But old Tony went the other   direction,  and  left   even the outskirts for the desert itself to get   away from it   all to  get  into it all.  But the crowds followed --   everybody loves  an   exotic  "holy man" -- and Tony took on the more   advanced cases of  this   mania  and left the rest to his associates, a   Christian Oracle  of  Delphi,   which "guidance" was later variously   collected as the   Sayings of the   Desert Fathers, or Apophthegmata, if   you want a word   to impress somebody   in a combox or something.
Anyhoo,   Gus   reads this in 386, and on   the Easter Vigil of 387, Ambrose   baptises   Gus and his son.  The next   year, 388, he determines to return   home   to North Africa.  Which he did,   but along the way both his   mother   and his son died, so he arrives alone   in the world, and     understandably unsure of himself once again.  Next  he  sells the family     stuff and gives the money away, except the house  which  he turns   into  a  sort of lay monastery.  I guess that's what you  do when  you   read   about dudes in the desert, rather than go through the  grief and    live   on in the world of people.
Meanwhile, the struggling   Roman Empire  and its new state Catholic Church are on a roll. The   Imperial  state  Catholic Church destroys  the Temple of  Apollo at the    Oracle of Delphi  in 390 and the Serapeum  and Great  Library in   Alexandria  in 391, in  which same year Augustine was ordained    presbyter, or priest,  in the  official  state church, in 391 in Hippo,   now Annaba, Algeria.
This   mostly academic and  political   controversy, in which Gus' unsettled  life  had its context and  of   which it is typical, changed when Western  Emperor  Valentinian II  was   found hanged in his home on 16 May 392, as  we saw above.  His half    brother and  co-Emperor Gratian was already  dead, killed 25 August 383   in  Lyon  France by forces of Roman generals  who thought he was losing   his  grip.   The official word was Valentinian  was a suicide, but his   wife and   others though he was done in by his  military power behind   the throne,   the Frank Arbogastes, and the  Imperial Milan court   church's bishop,   Ambrose, as we saw left the  question open, suicide   being a no-no for a Christian   Emperor held up  as a hero.
IX. Theodosius, Last Emperor East and West, Closes Old State Religion, 392/3. 
On    22 August 392, Arbogastes, who  being a Frank and not Roman could not     be Emperor, names a Roman  Christian named Eugenius Western Emperor,     who though Christian was  sympathetic to traditional Roman religion  and    started replacing officials sympathetic to the Eastern  Empire in  the   West.   The Eastern Empire put off  recognition of the new  Western   regime, and  finally in January of 392  Theodosius declared  his   two-year-old son  Honorius as Western Emperor and   begins  preparing an   invasion of the  Western Empire, which began in May  394  and concluded   in the victory at  The Frigidus 6 September 394.    Arbogastes commits   suicide and Eugenius  is beheaded by the Catholic   forces of Theodosius.
Also   in 392, Theodosius and his Roman  Empire and its Catholic Church shut   down the Eleusinian Mysteries.   Huh? What the hell were they and why is   shutting them down a big deal?   The Eleusinian Mysteries were one of  the  two great foundational  rituals of Rome dating actually from ancient   Greece before it, the  other being the Olympic Games (yeah, they get  shut  down too, but we'll  get to that shortly).
The basis for the   Eleusinian Mysteries  was the  story about Hades  seeing Persephone out   one day picking  flowers, went  nuts for her and  took her away to,  well,  Hades, the  realm of death, with  the OK of Zeus,  her dad. Her  mom  Demeter, aka  Ceres by the Romans,  goddess of life,  therefore  fertility  and  agriculture, went looking for  her and abandoned  her  duties,  causing  famine and drought, and finally with  the help of  Zeus  found  her and  thus ended the calamity of the first Winter with the  first   Spring.   However, Persephone had to abide by certain terms. She  had to   spend   four months with Hades in the Underworld, four months  with   Demeter,  and  the last four she could choose, and she chose  Demeter. The   four  months  with Hades are the hot, dry Greek Summer,  prone to  drought   and forest  fires, during which the saddened Demeter  neglects  her  duties  until  Persephone comes back.
So what were  The   Mysteries? Nobody knows the details for sure. They were secret     initiation rites into the  deal about Demeter and Persephone, thought to     unite the initiate with  the gods, with divine power and a good    outcome  in the afterlife. Nobody  knows exactly how they started, but    they drew  from all over, open to  all, free and slave, male or female,    as long as  you hadn't murdered  anyone and weren't a barbarian,  which   is not what  you may think, it's  someone who can't speak Greek  and   instead makes  stupid sounds like  bar-bar, literally. There were    Greater and Lesser  Mysteries, the Lesser  being done every year  around   March, when Summer  is just around the  corner, and the Greater  every   five years in late  Summer, when the Fall  rains and planting  come and   the new year (in the  local calendar) begins.
Next, in  393,   Theodosius, his Roman Empire and its Catholic Church, shut down  the   Olympic Games?  OK, what the hell were they and why was shutting  them   down a big deal?
The  Olympic Games began in 776 BC. The  Greek   city states were almost   constantly at war, but for the Games,  there   was peace. In addition to   athletic qualification, one had to  be male,   of the free class, and Greek   speaking to participate. There  are   several myths as to why the games   began, but why the games  ended is   clear. The Emperor Theodosius I, aka   Theodosius the Great,  the last   Emperor of both the Eastern and Western   Roman Empire,  outlawed them   after the games of 393 AD as part of the   establishment  of Christianity   as defined at the Council of Nicea as the   state  religion, as we saw.
This   also ended a  practical effect of the  games -- time was counted in    Olympiads, the four  year interval  between games, giving a unity to the    various calendars of  the  city-states, and this of course ended with   the  games no longer  being  held. The site remained, however, until it   was  destroyed in an   earthquake in the Sixth Century. In the 2004   modern  Olympic Games,  the  shot put contest was held in the ancient   stadium.  What's a  stadium?  Where the stade (stadion) race is run, the   original  single  event of the  Olympics, a sprint of somewhere around   200 metres,  the  exact length  unknown. Over time other events were   added, and the   games were one of  the two great rituals of ancient   Greece, the other   being the Eleusinian  Mysteries.
The  Games of   course have  their modern version, though one no longer needs to  be   male or Greek  speaking to participate.  Or wait for Summer -- there's   Winter Games  now too!  So we now can have something like neither the   Greeks nor the  entire ancient world ever had, the incomparable Katarina   Witt.   Beyond her many accomplishments in the Olympics and since, the   free  programme at the 1994 Winter Olympics to "Sag mir wo die Blumen   sind"  (Where Have All The Flowers Gone) was not only a stunning    accomplishment of art and athletics, an expression of a Germany    re-united from the latest of its many sad episodes throughout history, a    message of peace and hope to Sarajevo, then torn by war and the site   of  her first Olympic gold medal, but, Sarajevo being the match for the    fire that consumed the remnants of the Holy Roman Empire made from  the   remnants of the Roman Empire that had emerged from the Greek and  Roman   antiquity before it resulting in two horrific world wars and the    emergence of the contemporary world from the ruins of all that,  connects   to and is expressive of the enduring human spirit through the  entire   march of events we are covering here.
You might say, this post is exactly about where the flowers went.
Theodosius,    as we saw, shut down the Eleusinian  Mysteries too the year before in    392 There were a  few holdouts from the Nicene  Christian end, but  they   were stomped out  four years later by Alaric,  King of the Goths,  who   was an Arian  Christian. So, between Nicene and  Arian  Christianity and   an earthquake,  the more or less thousand year era   of the Olympic  Games  and two  thousand year era of the Eleusinian   Mysteries came to  an end.
And   speaking of forest fires, in  Persephone's  four  months with Hades, aka   Summer, of 2007, massive  forest fires nearly   destroyed the site of  the  ancient Olympics,  which hosted one of the   Seven Wonders of the  World,  the twelve metre  tall ivory and gold  Statue  of Zeus, but thanks  to  modern  firefighting, unless you think  Zeus relented  to save what's  left  and  let Persephone come back and  then Demeter got  active again,  what's   left is still left and made it  through this most  recent threat.
On    6 September 394 the  Eastern Emperor Theodosius I defeated the   Western   Emperor Eugenius at  the conclusion of the two-day Battle of  The    Frigidus.  Judas, more  stuff, what the hell is that?  It's the   conclusion of Theodosius'  preparation to stamp out Western resistance   the Edict of Thessalonica.  The Frigidus is a river, the Latin name  means   "cold"  as its English  descendant "frigid" suggests.  It is in    northeastern  Italy and  Slovenia and is now called the Vipacco in    Italian and the  Vipava in  Slovene, and of course I gotta tell ya it is    called the  Wipbach in  modern German, or, as b and p get sort of    interchangeable in  German  sometimes, the Wippach.  At the end of  which,  remember, Arbogastes  commits suicide and Eugenius  is beheaded  by the  Catholic  forces of  Theodosius.
Right after that, the  same year,  394, the Imperial   state Catholic Church, still on a roll  -- having  destroyed  the Temple  of Apollo at the  Oracle of Delphi in  390 and the  Serapeum  and Great  Library in Alexandria  in 391, the  year Augustine  was ordained  a  priest in the official  church, and  having ended the two  great  rituals  of ancient Greece, the  Eleusinian  Mysteries in 392 and  the  Olympic  Games after the ones in 393 -- puts  out the fire considered   essential  to Rome's survival at the Temple   of Vesta, and disbands the   women who  were personally selected by the   pontifex maximus, when that   meant  the head of the traditional Roman   religion rather than the head   of  the new state Catholic religion.
Hey,  Vestal Virgins, I've  heard  of that!  Well, there's more that just the  pop culture reference  and  the jokes.  The Temple of Vesta.  So who  was Vesta, why build her a   temple and who did it.  Vesta, though she  resembles somewhat the Greek   goddess Hestia, is a real Roman thing  moreso than the Olympic Games and   the Eleusinian Mysteries.  Vesta is  the goddess of hearth and home,  but,  not just one's own hearth and  home, but the whole Roman thing too,  and  her sacred fire was the  connexion to life itself, and the gods.
The   original temple,  called Aedes Vestae in Latin, was built by Numa   Pompilius, the second  King of Rome, from 715 to 673 BC.  The fire was   tended by women  specially selected by the pontifex maximux and bound to   celibacy for  30 years.  One of the early ones, Rhea Silvia, according  to  Livy in Ab  Urbe Condita -- which means "from the city (Rome, of  course)  having  been founded" -- was found by the god of war Mars in the  forest,  had  sex, and gave birth to the twins Romulus and Remus, the  founders of   Rome, but, as she wasn't supposed to be doing stuff like  this, and when   her uncle Amulius heard of it ordered a servant to kill  the boys, but   the servant instead put them in a basket in the River  Tiber,  whereupon  they were discovered by a wolf, who, having just lost  her  own cubs,  raised them.
So this whole thing goes right to the   heart of  Rome's self-concept, individually and corporately.  To shut   it down is  to shut down Rome, people, city, empire, the works.  So when   Theodosius  shut it down, what with his Catholic Church he himself   proclaimed and  all as the new Roman religion, this was either the end   of everything, or  a last step in the victory of the new religion over   its pagan past.
Theodosius  had started out fairly tolerant of   pagans,  whose support particularly   among the ruling class he needed,   but got  himself excommunicated by St   Ambrose, Bishop of Milan, in   390. His  governor in Thessalonica had  been  assassinated, and he   ordered massacres  in retaliation, but after   excommunication did   public penance for months  and his orders against   pagan institutions   probably were an extension of  this.
Guess  what?  The  next   year, 395,  Augustine becomes religious head, which is  called  bishop,   of the Roman  Imperial administrative unit called a  diocese, in   Hippo.   Guess Gus  knew on which side his bread is  buttered.  You damn  well  better believe because of the authority of the  "Catholic Church"  when  it has the authority to pull off stuff like this!
The    Battle of  The  Frigidus effectively ended any Western resistance to   the  new  state  church.  But, this enormous civil war though left  the    Western  Empire greatly weakened, and it collapsed a thousand years     before the  Eastern Empire did, starting with the Visigoths, under  their  King  Alaric, an Arian Christian, sacking Rome on 24 August 410.    Augustine,  by then 56 and still Bishop of Hippo, then writes more     Platonism to  assure the shocked Romans that though the joint was a  mess,    the real  and ideal City of God was the real winner despite the  total  mess.   Ideal behind the apparent real, neo Platonic junk like  that,  rather  than one reality, some of which we see and some we don't,  but all  one  thing, and none of it to be despised because God made it  all.
What's   of Lutheran interest about this? Well, whaddya  think, on Sunday  morning  do we have a toned down Greek mystery   religion filtered  through Nicene  Christianity and the new Imperial  state  religion,  loosely based on a  fundamental misunderstanding of  Jewish  messianism  that would have  passed into history long ago were  it not so  reinvented  through Greek  mythology, or, do we have the  revealed religion  of God  through Jesus  Christ, completing and  fulfilling the incomplete  hints  of it found in  human religion in  Greek antiquity and everywhere  and in  the previously  revealed  religion of the Old Covenant?
I'll go with the latter. And I'm glad the site of the classic Games made it through the 2007 fires.
But    those old Roman families knew a thing or two  about  survival and    they  became papal families, eventually  supplying  Pope Gregory   (another  Great), made  Pope 3 September 590, who ruled the state    church  like a  real Roman  indeed though the state whose church it was,   was in ruins.
X. Western Empire Collapses in 476, Eastern Empire Continues to 1453.
The     Western Empire continued until 4 September 476, when Romulus  Augustus    (what a name, combining one of the traditional founders of  Rome with    Octavian its first emperor!) was deposed deposed by the  Germanic king    Odoacer and never succeeded. So he was the last Western  Roman Emperor.    Well, sort of. His father, Flavius Orestes, was  appointed by Julius    Nepos as a senior general officer, magister  militum, working with the    Germanic foederati. The foederati -- see  the word federal in there? --    were non-Roman tribes bound by a treaty  (foedus) where though they    weren't citizens they weren't colonies  either. But they had to supply    troops to Rome, and by this time the  Western Roman military relied    heavily on them. Orestes struck a deal  with a Germanic foederati king,    Odoacer, to overthrow Julius Nepos,  which they did on 28 August 475 in    Ravenna, which had become the  Western capital in 402. Nepos fled to,    guess where, Dalmatia, same as  old Diocletian. Orestes put his son    Romulus Augustus on the throne  though he was barely a teen. But then    Odoacer turned on Orestes and  captured and killed him on 28 August 476,    then deposed Romulus on 4  September 476, though letting him live in    consideration of his young  age. The Roman Senate, acting for Odoacer,    asked the Eastern Emperor  Zeno to reunite the Empire, but Zeno said    Julius Nepos was the  rightful ruler, yet allowed Odoacer to rule in    Zeno's name though  Nepos was recognised as Emperor.
So, you could    say Julius  Nepos was the last Western Emperor too. Nepos, btw, was    killed in  exile by his own soldiers, caught in the middle of his own    efforts to  retake power from Odoacer and the efforts of the Emperor    before him,  Glycerius, to exact revenge. Glycerius was not a rightful    Emperor,  having been appointed by a previous magister militum, Gundobad,     rather than the rightful appointer, the Eastern Emperor Leo I, who     eventually appointed his nephew Nepos (hence the name). Glycerius     surrendered to him without a fight, Gundobad having abandoned him, in     consideration for which Nepos made him bishop of Salona, Dalmatia. When     Nepos was killed 25 April 480, Odoacer, who wasn't even a Nicene     Christian but an Arian, made him bishop of Milan, Ambrose's old seat.     Helluva deal.
Ah yes, bishops in a direct line of succession from the Apostles.
Didn't    go so well for old Odoacer though.  His popularity with what was left    of the Romans and his treaties with the Franks and Visigoths (more    Germans) got the Eastern Emperor really worried.  So he started a    political campaign against Odoacer in 488, which in the end got the    Ostrogoths (East Goths, more Germans) under Zeno convinced they had to    get rid of Odoacer.  So, the king of the Ostrogoths, Theodoric (another    Great), takes up arms against Odoacer, with the promise he would get    Italy if successful, which would conveniently too get rid of the    Ostrogoths for Zeno.  By 490, Theodoric had defeated Odoacer in three    major battles, and laid seige to Odoacer's capitol Ravenna, which lasted    three years, but neither side could totally defeat the other.  So, on  2   February 493 the two signed a treaty to share rule, and a banquet  was   arranged to celebrate peace.  At the banquet, Theodoric proposes a    toast, then personally kills Odoacer, becoming the sole ruler in the    West, based in Ravenna!  Both these guys were Arian Christians btw.
Theodoric,    though technically a vassal of the Eastern Empire, in effect was the    new if unofficial Western emperor.  But the tensions between the old    Roman culture and the new Roman culture imposed from the East remained.     Being an Arian, he was not an insider with the Nicene East, and  became   suspicious of his Western Nicene subjects, to the extent that  he had  his  own magister officiorum, director of government services, a  Roman  named  Boethius, who was a man of great learning, executed in  525.    Many  other similar but lesser Romans followed.  All of them,  Roman and   Germanic types alike, were real big on preserving the old  Roman world   (Rome is in the West after all!) but now modified by its  new synthesis   with Christianity, to carry on into the future.  But the  East/West,   Arian/Nicene, Roman/Germanic tensions were enormous, and  it would take   several centuries for this effort to come to be, as we  shall see below,   with the coronation of Charlemagne in 800, and then  Otto and the Holy   Roman Empire in 962 as the final transfer of  imperial succession from   the old to the new Rome, "apostolic  succession" in the state church part   of the imperial succession, and  this successor had a pretty long run,   until 1806, outlasting the  Eastern Empire which fell in 1453, and the   state churches of both  still survive without their states!
The    Eastern Empire  considered itself and called itself Roman to the end.    Latin was for  some time its official language, though Greek was used    outside the  court and eventually became official. Yet in Rome, the elite    spoke  Greek, though in time that passed too. Each half, while sharing    many  common elements, took on its own culture even though the Roman     borrowed much from the Greek, and the eventual prominence of each's     language both symbolises and contributes to the outcome.
The East     outlasted the West by about a thousand years. It continued until its     defeat by the Ottomans in 1453. The Ottoman Empire itself lasted  from    1299 to 1922 when the British Empire, having won World War I,   partioned   it into the Middle Eastern countries that are in the news   almost daily   right now.
After the Eastern Empire fell, Czarist   Russia, having   long since become Eastern Orthodox from the Eastern   Roman Empire,   considered itself the "third" Rome -- Rome itself being   the first and   Constantinople being the second. Constantinople, the   Eastern Empire   capital itself a rename of Byzantium by Constantine   after Constantine,   got renamed again as Istanbul on 28 March 1930 by   the secular Republic   of Turkey, which would no longer deliver mail   addressed to   "Constantinople" and had moved the capital of Turkey to   Ankara, the new   name for Angora.
XI. West Makes Comeback as Holy Roman Empire, 800, Lasts Until 1806.
Hey,     whatever happened to Eboracum, where his father's army had  proclaimed    Constantine Emperor? It's still there! After the Western  Empire fell  in   476, the Angles -- more Germans -- invaded and took  over and called   the  city Eoferwic. Then the Vikings -- not more  Germans exactly, but    Germanic -- blew in in 866 and called it Jorvik,  probably a    re-pronunciation easier on Viking ears. Then in 1066 the  Normans -- not a    bunch of guys named Norman but people from Normandy  just across the    English Channel -- really blew in and took over,  William the Conqueror    sacking the place, and in time the name morphed  from Jorvik to York,    with variant spellings. And that's what it is  to-day -- York, England.    And everyone knows about the new York in,  well, New York. Guess what,    there's a York here in Nebraska too!
So  what's that all about, a    French smoothing over of rough Germanic  edges? Some see it that way,   but  that's not really the deal. The  Normans themselves result from   Vikings  -- there you go, more Germanic  types -- raiding the area,   joining up  with the locals, providing a  hedge against yet more Vikings   raiding the  area, taking on the local  culture and adding their  original  one, and  becoming The Northmen,  from which the names Norman  and  Normandy derive.
So  it's  Frenched-over Vikings on top of  Vikings  on top of Germans on top  of  Romans on top of Celts on top of,  some  say, the Old Ones. That's   where my ancestors came from. And they  say  the US is a melting pot!  True  that, but where we came from is a  melting  pot too.
Well,  once  the Western Empire fell, the West  attempted  to come out of what  are  called the Dark Ages of overrun by  the "Huns",  those formerly  outside  the Empire, with the formation of  the Holy  Roman Empire when  on  Christmas 800 Leo III, the Bishop of  Rome, an  office which to this  day  bears the title pontifex maximus,  crowned the  King of the Franks   Charlemagne Holy Roman Emperor  (imperator augustus,  to be exact).  This  was a conscious attempt to  re-establish the Western  Roman Empire  --  though someone famously said  it was neither Roman nor  holy nor an  empire  -- and lasted about a  thousand years, until the last  Holy  Roman  Emperor, Francis II,  dissolved it in the Napoleonic Wars in   1806.
Things  were off to  a roaring good start, with the chief   religious functionary  of the  state religion crowning the head of state   and all. Charlemagne  put  to-gether a pretty good empire, emphasising  --  in case you thought   this was a new idea with the current European   Union -- a pan-European   identity. Well, actually, his grandfather   Charles Martel, which means   "The Hammer", put it to-gether for him but   did not take the title   Emperor, or even King as his son Pepin did at   Pope Zachary's  nomination.  Charlemagne completes the transition from   his grandfather  and father as  Roman Emperor, Imperator Augustus to  be  exact, so  crowned by the Roman  Pope in 800.
But we all die,  even   emperors, and Charlemagne died  28 January 814 in Aachen  (Germany), his   capital. He was buried the same  day in Aachen  Cathedral -- hell, call   it right, the Kaiserdom, Imperial  Cathedral  -- which he had begun as   his palace chapel and was consecrated  in  Mary's (as in Jesus' mother)   honour by Pope Leo III in 805. In 1978   it was among the 12 places   designated a World Heritage Site by UNESCO,   the United Nations   Educational, Scientific and Cultural  Organisation. An  eyewitness   account says when Emperor Otto III opened  the vault in 1000,    Charlegmagne was sitting upright as if still  ruling, only the tip of    his nose having decomposed. It's been opened  since without similar    report.
Back to the story, Charlegmagne  the year before he died    had named his only surviving son who wasn't a  bastard -- not what you    think, I mean in the technically correct  sense of not the legitimate    offspring of a husband and wife -- his  successor. Well, sort of. It's    always "sort of" when it's "Roman".  Charlemagne was actually married to    Desiderata, princess daughter of  the Lombard (a Germanic tribe in    northern Italy) king Desiderius as  part of a peace with him, in 770, but    the next year the marriage was  annulled, Pope Stephen III having said    Pepin said he was to be  married to someone Frankish, and she went  home   to her dad's court and  war came in 774. This getting rid of   inconvenient  first wives is  sort of a pattern, isn't it -- right along   with the  church finding it  OK, in case you thought Henry VIII started   it. But,  there were no  kids and the next year he married the 13 year   old daughter  of Swabian  (Southern Germany) Count Gerold, Hildegard.   There were nine  kids,  though he appears to have had this Himiltrude in   there somewhere  as a  wife or concubine, so maybe Hildegard was Wife  #3.  Oh well.
Anyway,   this son and successor is Louis, known as  the  Pious. Originally,   following the usual custom, Louis was to share  his  father's rule   divided with his brothers, and such were  Charlemagne's  provisions in  the  Divisio regnorum (Division of the  Rule) of 806, but  by 814 his  two  brothers who also weren't bastards  were dead so Louis  got the  whole pie.  He rushed to Aachen and crowned  himself, though on 5   October 816 Pope  Stephen IV, who followed after  Leo III who had   crowned his father,  crowned him officially in Rheims.  Then ordered   everyone to be loyal to  Louis.
Louis tried real  hard, but most   of his rule was plagued by  continual frontier wars with  those outside   his realm and civil wars,  three of them, with those  inside his  realm.  Starting to sound like the  problems that always get  Roman  Empires --  running a big realm with no  modern communications or   travel, keeping  the lid on externally and  internally, and specifically   re internally  providing for an orderly  succession, Gets 'em every   time. Louis had his  unmarried sisters and  bastard brothers enter   convents and monasteries,  to avoid power  brokering marriages -- he   also ordered all cloisters to  follow the Rule  of St Benedict, kick ass   Louis! -- and provided for an  orderly  succession in his ordinatio   imperii of 817, which both  followed the  custom of dividing among sons   and also the custom of the  first-born  taking pride of place, that   being Lothair who would be  Emperor.
But  there were problems.   His nephew Bernard was also in  on the succession  deal, but when he   revolted and wanted more, Louis  had him blinded, from  which he died   two days later. So in 822 he does  public penance before  the Pope   (Paschal I this time), and let his  relatives out of their  monastic   orders, both of which lost him his cred  with the nobles and  pretty   much everyone. On top of that, his wife  Ermengarde died in 818,  whom   he seems to have genuinely loved, and in  820 he marries Judith,    daughter of Count Welf of Altdorf (way southern  Germany, called    Weingarten since 1865 from the name of the wealthy  abbey, Benedictine   of  course, founded there in 1065), which leads to a  son Charles in   823.  Which led to the civil wars, the existing sons of  the deceased   wife  having none of this new guy horning in on what's  theirs. Louis   died on  20 June 840 and war over who got what continued  for three   years until  the Treaty of Verdun in 843 settled things among  the three   surviving  sons and pretty much set the Europe we know now,  along  with  its  conflicts. Lothair got the Emperor title and the Middle   Frankish   Kingdom, Louis "the German" got the Eastern Frankish Kingdom   which is   pretty much Germany now, and Charles "the Bald" got the   Western  Frankish  Kingdom which is pretty much France now.
But  no  real  empire  emerged. The Middle Frankish Kingdom fell apart and  the  other  two and  about anyone else with some money and an army were  at it  all  the time,  including the damn Vikings from the North. The  guy who   really  re-established things was Otto I, son of Heinrich der  Vogler   (Henry the  Fowler) out of East Francia, Louis the German's  third.   Heinrich ensured  the recognition of West Francia by East  Francia which   was still under  Carologian rulers. But when his son  Otto was crowned   with the title  Emperor on 2 February 962 by Pope  John XII at St Peter's   Basilica in  Rome, this was the translatio  imperii, the transfer of   rule, in which  this German empire was  considered -- especially by those   who ran it  and/or hoped to benefit  from it -- as the new Roman Empire   in direct  succession from the old  Roman Empire, though of course the   actual  Eastern Roman Empire was  still up and running at the time.
For    that reason, Otto is  considered by some the real first Holy Roman    Emperor. The Holy Roman  Empire -- Das Heiliges Roemisches Reich in    German, or Sacrum Romanum  Imperium in Latin -- earned the quip of not    being holy, nor Roman,  nor an Empire by largely being held to-gether by    the same three  forces Otto put it to-gether. One was his control over    bishops and  abbots and their investiture into office not to mention    selection for  office; Two was proprietary churches, meaning they    belonged to the  ruler who owner the land on which they stood unless    otherwise agreed  by charter; Three was the use of an appointed rather    than hereditary  advocatus, or Vogt in German, to run church properties    and estates.  Power was a balance of concessions to local rulers for    support in  order to have power over local rulers, with the Pope in the    balance  too.
For example, Pope John XII who had crowned Otto  soon    turned on him, so Otto went back to Rome, deposed Otto, and had a     layman elected Pope, that being Leo VII, but then John attempted a     comeback, but died and was followed by Benedict V, so Otto heads back to     Rome again to get rid of Benedict and make them promise to quit     electing popes without the Emperor's approval.
Silver and gold have I none indeed.
So     on it goes, back and forth. Eventually, the Golden Bull of 1356,    passed  by the Reichastag, the legislature of the HRE, and Holy Roman    Emperor  Charles IV, fixed the election of "Roman Emperors" to be by    seven  electors who would elect a "King of the Romans" (rex romanorum,     roemischer Koenig) in Frankfurt in the old East Francia. Emperor-elect     was sufficient for rule, but the Pope would then officially crown  the    King of the Romans Holy Roman Emperor. The electors are: the   Archbishops   (who were also temporal rulers, hence the term Princes of   the Church)   of Cologne, Mainz, and Trier, the Count Palatine of the   Rhine, the King   of Bohemia, the Duke of Saxony, and the Margrave of   Brandenburg. The   papal coronation was not specified, and the last HRE   to be crowned by a   Pope was Charles V, crowned HRE by Pope Clement  VII  in Bologna in 1530.
Charles   V, he to whom the Augsburg   Confession is addressed? Yes, the same. He   was Spanish too -- yay --   the son of Felipe I and Joanna (sometimes   called The Mad) of Castille,   though he was born and raised in Ghent,   Flanders (modern Begium then   under Spanish control) and never did speak   Spanish very well despite   being King of Spain too, as Charles I. He is   said to have said "I   speak Spanish to God, Italian to women, French to   men, and German to   my horse".
Charles' reign would have been   peaceful except for a   few things: by his time the Eastern Roman Empire   had collapsed in   defeat to the Ottomans in 1453, who were then   threatening to conquer   Europe itself; colonisation of the Americas and   the Pacific had opened   up an entirely new world to manage, literally,   and the combination  of  Christian, non-Christian, and political elements   from the state   religion of the Roman Empire through the same state   religion of the   Holy Roman Empire had finally sparked an effort to   recall the church   to its nature and mission as established by Christ,   not by Romans of   varying descriptions. And that effort is called the   Lutheran   Reformation.
Charles more and more left dealing with the     Reformation to his brother Ferdinand. He hoped the Council of Trent     would solve everything and put everything back to-gether. It didn't. How     to handle the worldwide empire, and the wealth that flowed from it,   in   the Americas (including Nebraska where I am right now) and the    Pacific,  almost continual war with France, and almost continual war    with the  Ottoman Empire -- led by Suleiman the Magnificent, no less --    was an  enormous job, and eventually took its toll, not to mention    lifelong  health problems such as epilepsy, arthritis, and an inability    to eat  well due to an enlarged lower jaw. Charles abdicated all his    titles on  16 January 1556, leaving his son Felipe II King of Spain and    its empire  and his brother Fernando Holy Roman Emperor, and retired  --   not as you  or I do, but with an entourage of fifty or so to  special   apartments --  to the monastery of Yuste in Spain, not a  Benedictine one   but of the  Hieronymites, the Order of St Jerome, a  Spanish order  which  took St  Jerome as its patron saint and lived  under the Rule of  St  Augustine,  like the Augustinians of whom Martin  Luther was a  member. He  died there  21 September 1558.
16  January. Remember  that? 16  January 27 BC,  when the Roman Senate make  Octavian Emperor,  Augustus.  16 January 1556,  Charles to whom the  Augsburg Confession is  addressed  as a statement of  Christian teaching  abdicates everything.
The   Holy Roman Empire  continued until  Napoleon. Francis II was the last   Holy Roman Emperor,  and after his  defeat by Napoleon at Austerlitz   abolished the HRE on 6  August 1806.  Ironically, the monastery of Yuste,   where Charles V, also a  Hapsburg,  had retired was also destroyed in   the Napoleonic Wars.
XII.  Successor Empires East And West Last Until World War I.
Francis     II though, thinking the HRE was about at an end, set up shop as  Franz    I, Emperor of Austria in 1804, "emperor" being "Kaiser", a    Germanisation  of "Caesar" expressing the idea of continuity with the    HRE and the  Roman Empire itself. This became the Austro-Hungarian    Empire in 1867  during the reign (1848 - 1916) of the third Kaiser,    Franz Joseph I and  this Habsburg dynasty lasted until Karl I, the    fourth and last Kaiser,  when it was defeated in the First World War. On    11 November 1918,  Armistice Day, he relinquished the throne, but he    did not say abdicate,  hoping to be recalled. He never was, the  Austrian   parliament enacted a  law 3 April 1919 banning any Hapsburgs  from   Austria unless they accepted  simple status as citizens, and he  died in   poverty in forced exile in  Madeira, an island off Portugal, 1  April   1922.
Total span of this empire, 1804 - 1918.
The   Germans   per se went through decades of disunity and unrest before  the    establishment of the German Empire on 18 January 1871, under the     leadership of the Kingdom of Prussia through the efforts of Otto von     Bismarck, with the coronation of the King of Prussia of the House of     Hohenzollern as Kaiser -- same deal on the word -- of the German  Empire    (Deutsches Kaiserreich). This lasted until the third and last  German    Kaiser, Wilhelm II, officially abdicated on 29 November 1918,  though  did   not formally renounce his titles, fleeing to the neutral   Netherlands,   hoping to return someday. He never did, not even in death   though the  new  German ruler, Hitler, who hated him, wanted his   funeral in Germany  to  lend credence to the Nazi state as heir to the   Kaiserreich, though  his  wish that no Nazi symbols be used was ignored   at his Dutch funeral.
Total span of this empire, 1871 - 1918.
As     to the Russians, we saw above that when the Eastern Roman Empire  fell    to the Ottoman Empire Moscow began to see itself as the "Third  Rome"    replacing it, even adopting the Eastern Empire's double headed  eagle  as   its coat of arms. Peter the Great, Tsar of the Tsardom of  Russia,    sometimes called the Tsardom of Muscovy (as in Moscow)  proclaimed the    the Empire on 22 October 1721, if you use the  Gregorian calendar, or 11    October if you use the older Julian  calendar (and I ain't going into   all  this calendar stuff again, see  the New Years post for that). Tsar,    where did that word come from? A  Russianisation of, guess what,  Caesar!   It lasted until the Bolshevik  October Revolution overthrew it  on 7   November 1917 -- how do you have  an October Revolution in  November, same   calendar stuff, the day is  25 October in the old Julian  calendar. The   last Tsar, Nicholas II of  the House of Romanov (hear  "Rome" in there?)   itself part of the north  German House of Oldenburg,  was executed with   his family 16 July  1918.
Total span of this empire, 1721 (or 16 January 1547 if you include the Tsardom of Russia) - 1917.
As     to the Ottoman Empire, after the defeat of the Ottoman Empire and  its    allies in World War I -- an irony in itself, the Ottoman Empire   allied   with, along with the Kingdom of Bulgaria, the Austro-Hungarian   Empire   and the German Empire, the then current version of two powers   it had   scared the living hell out of for centuries -- the  surrendering  Sultan,   Mehmed VI, hoped to preserve the sultanate by  co-operating  with the   victors, and the caliphate too. However the  Ottoman lands of  the Middle   East and Balkans had been structured into  new countries by  the Allies,   the British in the lead, the countries  we have to-day, and  the Turkish   National Assembly abolished the  Sultanate, the imperial  head of state,   on 1 November 1922, Mehmed VI  left the country on 17  November 1922, on   24 July 1923 the Assembly  was internationally  recognised by the Treaty   of Lausanne, and it  proclaimed a republic 29  October 1923 with Ankara   the new capital,  which was the end of the  Ottoman Empire after 700 years   but not the  Ottoman Caliphate.
That  happened when Mustafa Kemal   Ataturk,  very Westernised in his thinking  (he invited American   educational  reformer John Dewey to advise the  reform of public education   in the  new country, for example) and the  father of modern Turkey, had   the  National Assembly abolish the  caliphate on 3 March 1924, sending  the   last caliph, Abdul Mejid II,  along with any remaining members of  the   royal Ottoman family, the  Osmans, into formal exile. This was  despite   appeals from other Islamic  sources to retain the caliphate for  the  sake  of Islam, which only  fuelled opposition as foreign  intervention  and  helped seal the fate of  the caliphate. Although  various efforts  have  been made to agree on a  new caliphate, there has  been no  consensus to  date.
Total span of this empire, 1299 - 1922/3, depending on which event one takes as final.
XIII.  Where Are They Now?
Yes,     now. This stuff just didn't vanish. It's only been roughly 90 years     since the whole thing fell apart, not a long period in terms of the     whole of human history. We'll get to the main point, the religious     implications, in the next section but for now, the current state of     these ruling houses.
As to the Austrians, on 3 October 2004 Karl I     was beatified, one step before being declared a saint, by Pope John     Paul II on the basis of the Vatican's Congregation for the Causes of     Saints 2003 conclusion of his heroic virtue and one miracle through  is    intercession.  He earnestly sought peace, and was the only leader to ban the use of then-new chemical warfare, poison gas at the time.  JPII also declared 21 October, the date in 1911 of  his    marriage to Princess Zita, as his feast day. On 31 January 2008 a  second    miracle (one won't do it for sainthood) was formally  certified, the    miraculous cure through his intercession of a woman in  Florida -- who was Baptist at the time!  She has since converted to Catholicism.
His oldest son, Otto, headed the  family for many   years,  opposed Hitler, who sentenced him to death,  and was active as a   Member  of the European Parliament of the European  Union until 1999,  and  in  January 2007 passed the torch of head of  the House of Hapsburg  to  his  oldest son, Karl, though remaining Crown  Prince and pretender  to  the  throne.  He lived in Bavaria until he  died on 4 July 2010. Archduke Karl, born 11 January  1961,  was  also a  member of the European Parliament, and served as  director of  the  non  governmental organisation (NGO) UNPO,  Unrepresented Nations and    Peoples Organisation.  Since 2008 he has served as president of Association of National Committees of the Blue Shield, which is dedicated to preserving cultural heritage from wars and disasters, He is also active in business, a co-founder of a Vienna based private investment firm.
As to the  Germans, the current head of   the  House of Hohenzollern is Georg  Friedrich, great-great grandson of    Wilhelm II, born 10 June 1976 in  Bremen, Germany. He became head of  the   house on 26 September 1994 when  the previous pretender, his  grandfather   Louis Ferdinand I died, and  survived lengthy legal  challenges by his   uncles in German courts for  the role. He is quoted  as saying he sees no   need for change of the  current political system  in Germany, and as   thinking he is probably  happier than many of his  ancestors. He was married on 27 August 2011, the 950th anniversary of  the founding of the House of Hohenzollern.  He works for a company helping academic institutions bringing their innovations to the market, and also directs the Princess Kira of Prussia-Foundation, a charitable organisation founded by his grandmother.  The House of Hohenzollern website:  www.hohenzollern.com/ 
The House of Oldenburg has   had kings  on the  thrones of Russia, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Greece and    Iceland, as  well as dukes of all sorts of duchies all over the place,    including  the land from which my ancestors the Angles moved to  England,   now  known as Schleswig-Holstein. The current head of the  ducal house  as   well as the whole House of Oldenburg is Christoph,  born 22 August  1949,   living in Schwansen, Schleswig-Holstein, with  extensive business    interests in agriculture and real estate, and is a founding member and chairman of the advisory board of GLC Glücksburg Consulting Group, a marketing and communications firm.  Website: http://www.glc-group.com/  By a  bunch of stuff I'm not    even going to get into, except to say they  result from Queen Victoria    being among their ancestors, both he and  Georg Friedrich are technically    in line for the British throne too,  though at 150+ in line (no official list is maintained to this extent) they are a bit of a long shot.
Matter  of fact, there's Oldenburgs   still  on thrones, Margrethe II of  Denmark and head of the state   Lutheran  church, and Harald V of Norway  and head of the state Lutheran   church,  not to mention Queen Sofia of  Spain, who may queen there   because she  married Juan Carlos the king  but is the sister of the   unpopular last  king of Greece, the Oldenburg  Constantine II, deposed in   1973 and now  living in London.  Interesting how some of the most   liberal countries in  Europe, like  Denmark, Norway and Sweden, also have   monarchs and liberal  state  "Lutheran" churches. The King of Sweden  btw  is not an Oldenburg  but  from the House of Bernadotte, set up by  the  French to be a client   monarchy to Napoleon. The Church of Sweden   (Lutheran) only became   independent of the state in 2000.
And in   Bavaria, good old   Bavaria, the kingdom of which has been kicked around  a  bit, the House  of  Wittlesbach was the ruling house from 1180 to  1918,  including good  old  King Ludwig whose money got where I got my   university education,  or if  not that spent a hell of a few years,   started in the New  World. The  current head of the house is Franz, Duke   of Bavaria, born  14 July 1933  in Munich.  Because of Wittlesbach opposition to the Nazis, he (age 11 at the time, 6 October 1944) and his family were arrested and put in concentration camps where they remained until liberated by the US Third Army in April 1945.  He went to the school at Kloster Ettal in Bavaria, which is Benedictine so you know he's ok.  He is active in many civic, charitable and   religious  organisations, and lives  in an apartment in the former Summer   palace  of the monarchy, Schloss  Nymphenburg (Nymph's Castle), which  is  also  where, on the south  pavillion of which, King Ludwig assembled  Die   Schoenheitengalerie (The  Gallery of Beauties), a collection of 36    portraits of what Ludwig  considered the most beautiful women of his,    um, acquaintance in varying  degrees, including the actress Lola Montez,    who inspired the catch  phrase "Whatever Lola wants, Lola gets". Oh,    and some say he's heir to  the House of Stuart and thus the true King  of   England instead of the  House of Windsor, which is from Hanover in    Germany, monarch, but as  Franz doesn't get into that, I won't either.    And hey, who of us doesn't  have a Gallery of Beauties on the south    pavillion of his mind?
As  to the Russians, wow. There is  dispute   as to who, and if anyone, heads  the house now. When the Grand  Duke   Vladimir died in Miami on 21 April  1992, a huge dispute ensued.  His   daughter and only child, Maria  Vladimirovna Romanova, born 23  December   1953 in Madrid, claimed pretence  to the Russian throne, with  Vladimir   the last male heir and her cousins  invalid as the children  of  marriages  with commoners, not nobility.  However, Nicholas Romanov,  her  cousin,  born 26 September 1922 in France,  claims headship as the   senior male  heir. And God bless me sideways if  Maria isn't also in   line for the  British throne, but way down the list too.
Complicating  all this is   the fall of  the Soviet Union, the Communist regime that  emerged from   the overthrow  of the Russian Empire, in 1991 and Russia's   re-emergence  as the Russian  Federation. On 17 July 1998, the 80th   anniversary of  their murders,  the bodies of Tsar Nicholas II and the   Tsaritsa  Alexandra, and the  bodies of their children then discovered,   were  reburied with full state  honours in the Cathedral of Saints  Peter  and  Paul in the imperial  capital city known again by its name  St   Petersburg. Nicholas led the  Romanov family members at the  funeral,  with  the then president of the  Russian Federation, Boris  Yeltsin,  there too.  Maria had written to him,  protesting that her  cousins are  not even  legitimate family members,  and did not attend.  On 14 August  2000 the  Russian Orthodox Church  declared Nicholas and  family saints,  and on 16  June 2003 Russian  Orthodox bishops  consecrated what is known  as the  Church of the Blood  on the site of  their executions. So the  "Third  Rome".
As to the  Turks, on 23  September 2009, at age 97,  as our  media were all abuzz  about upcoming  speeches at the UN by  Middle Eastern  leaders, Ertugrul  Osman died.  Were there still an  Ottoman Empire, he  would have been  known as Osman  V, Sultan of the  Ottoman Empire and  Caliph of Islam. He  will be now  the last pretender  to the throne to have  been alive when  the throne  was abolished by the  modern secular Turkish  state on 19  November  1922, and the last to have  been born in the Ottoman  Empire.
The   current head of the House  of Osman, the 44th, and  pretender to the   throne, Bayezid Osman, was  born 23 July 1924 in Paris,  the first to be   born in exile. He moved to  the United States in 1941,  even serving  in  the US Army. Were there  still an Ottoman Empire, he  would be known  as  Sultan Bayezid III and  Caliph of Islam (or at least  the Sunni  part of  it). He's 88, is not  married and has no children, and  heir  will be  Duendar Aliosman, born  in Damascus, Syria on 30 December   1930. He  married, but has no  children.
Thus the disposition of the royal houses and their current heads, but now on to the disposition of their churches.
XIV. Summation nostra aetate, In Our Time. 
The     Roman Empire, the Eastern and the Western Roman Empire, and the Holy     Roman Empire, spanned over 1,800 years, and are now gone. Great guys     like Otto and Karl, Georg Friedrich, Christoph and Franz, seem  worlds    removed from the carryings-on of some of their ancestors. We  all seem    worlds removed. The current Pope Benedict hasn't crowned any  emperors.    So what has this we've gone through above to do with  anything at all    now?
The state religion of the Roman Empire,  the Eastern Roman    Empire and the Western Roman Empire, Czarist Russia  and the Holy Roman    Empire after them, respectively, has outlasted  the empire which  created   them, and is still with us in their  respective churches. Tu es  Petrus,   thou are Peter, Christ said to  Peter in the phrase often  cited for  their  legitimacy. Legitimacy? Who  in their right minds  looking at all  we've  looked at find the  slightest thing about Thou art  Peter about it?  Who in  their right  minds would find such fleshly  goings-on at all  related to  God become  Man in the flesh? Yet this  perversion of the  Incarnation from  a truth  and an event into a  theological and  ecclesiastical principle, a   fabrication for the  benefit of those who  would benefit from it by  those  who would benefit  from it, is a  captivity from "Babylon" that  continues  to captivate  many. Until it is  recognised as such.
What  one  finds is  Christian elements mixed  up with pagan elements of the  old  state  religion, largely focussed on  matters of succession, the   longstanding  bane of the empires, with  generous helpings of political   necessity and  expediency thrown in too,  into a hybrid or synthesis   continuing to  this day.
This is not  at all to say that the  faith  of Jesus  Christ delivered to the Apostles  disappeared. It is to  say that   Christianity took on much, some of which  it would regard as  essential   and not cultural, from the state which  adopted it as its  new state   religion, the Roman Empire East and West.
Tertullian   first   applied the pagan Roman religious term pontifex to a "bishop"   about 225   when the Roman bishop, aka pope, Callistus relaxed the   penance for   adulterers -- as a derogatory reference, not a good thing,   describing   him as acting like a pagan religious leader. Pope Damasus   (366-384) is   said to have been the first to use the term, though  others  say this is   unsubstantiated. Nonetheless, Theodosius, he who  ended the  Olympic  Games  etc, called him pontifex, and the term became  a  reference to a  bishop,  summus pontifex or the original phrase  pontifex  maximus for  the bishop  of Rome, the pope. Leo I and Gregory I  are also  cited in  this regard.
And  behave like the officers  and head of  the old  pagan religion they did,  for centuries, as we  saw. The idea of a  bunch  of pontifices in a  collegium pontificum  headed by a pontifex   maximus/summus derives not at  all from the  institution of Christ but   from the morphing of leadership  and  ministry in the church after the   Roman Imperial state religion   appropriated the model for its pastors as   Christianity took on the  role  of state religion, then further took on   its Eastern and Western   characters due to the collapse of the Western   Empire and its  subsequent  history centuries before the collapse of  the  Eastern  Empire.
The  differences between Eastern Orthodoxy  and  Roman  Catholicism as a  religious image of the differences between  the   culture of the Eastern  and Western Roman Empire. The Western  Church,   complete with a pontifex  maximus, inherited Rome's  administrative and   legal bent, and the Eastern  Church inherited  Constantinople's more   philosophical and artistic bent.  The formal  schism between the two in   1054 had immediate theological  causes, but  was culturally inevitable,   bound to happen theology or not.
Remember,   in the East, the   Eastern Empire still existed at this time, but the   Western Empire was   gone, with the intended reincarnation as the Holy   Roman Empire in its   place, and the recognition of the bishop of Rome as   "first among   equals" at world-wide, called ecumenical from the Greek,   church   councils was then also extended to the bishop of  Constantinople,  the   new Rome. In the lands of the former Western  Empire the modern    languages spoken are derived from Latin, which  remained its liturgical    language, whereas in the lands of the former  Eastern Empire the    languages are not derived from Greek, which was not  its liturgical    language other than for Greeks.
Thus the  primary remains of this    in the West is the Roman administrative,  legalistic flair, and in  the   East the philosophical, mystical flair.  In Roman Catholicism,  even with   the moderating and revisionist slant  given it by Vatican  II, one hears   the religion of the Western Roman  Empire, and in  Eastern Orthodoxy one   hears the religion of the Eastern  Roman Empire.
While  the Roman   Empire, as a unified whole and  as a divided empire, has  passed into   history, their eventual religions  have not. And so the  reformation of   the church, the freeing of it  from the accretions of  Imperial culture   East and West, was to happen  from outside the  Empire, had to happen from   outside the Empire. And so  it did, the  Reformation being then not an   event in the Western Church  surviving  the Western Empire, but an event   in the one, holy, catholic  and  apostolic church from outside the Empire,   undivided, Eastern, or   Western.
And about those accretions.  They  aren't necessarily   bad. What's bad is if they contradict the books  the  church has said we   can rely on, the Bible. Not if they are not  found in  the Bible, if   they contradict the Bible. Big difference.  What's also bad  is, whether   they do or don't contradict the Bible, if  they are made  into   essentials. On these points, the Reformation would  go well beyond  the   Lutheran Reformation to a near eradication of them,  and then a    replacement of them with other forms of righteousness before  God   through  works rather than Jesus Christ, either way confusing    justification  before God with santification, personal growth in faith    and grace --  confusing participation in the sacraments, personal    decisions for  Christ, avoidance of immorality and doing good works in    general, with  justification before God through faith given by the Holy    Spirit apart  from any external or internal work or act on my part in    the saving Death  and Resurrection of Jesus Christ.
This post-    and non-Lutheran  Reformation resulted first in new state churches,    sometimes forcibly  including Lutheran ones (the Prussian Union comes  to   mind) and later in  churches influenced by the "Enlightenment"    political and theological  theories which have become the unofficial    state religions of the modern  Western secular liberal states,    abandoning even their prior confessions  of faith, one broad group    representing the religious Left and another  the religious Right.
XV. Conclusion. 
So,     confessional Lutheran churches uphold and teach the faith of Jesus     Christ taught in the Bible and accurately stated in the Book of  Concord,    and uphold and maintain the usual customs, rejecting only  what    contradicts the Gospel and recognising that the rest are  customs, not    Gospel or even Law. We are the churchly echo of neither  the ancient    empire nor the contemporary liberal state. And we worship  accordingly,    in the historical liturgy of the Divine Service, where  God the Divine    serves us his Word and Sacrament, not the other way  around.
And    after all this stuff, the great thing is, all you  really need to know  is   laid out in the Little Catechism. The thing I  like in poking around  in   all this stuff is that you appreciate ever  more fully that all you    really need to know is laid out in the Little  Catechism, and that, in    view of all this stuff that happened, what a  miracle of the Holy  Spirit   it is that we have it!
Some asides.  You pick up  some   interesting tidbits along the way too. Like the  Roman goddess of    agriculture, Ceres, a figure of which tops the  capital of Nebraska,  is   why we call it cereal. Or that July is for  Julius Caesar and August  for   Caesar Augustus. You get to have your  own month when you're a  founding   emperor and then proclaimed a god,  otherwise we'd call the  old fifth  and  sixth Roman months Quintember  and Sextember, as we still  do the   remaining months September (7th),  October (8th), November  (9th) and   December (10th).  So besides all  the big stuff we just waded  though,  this stuff is still in our lives  right down to what's for breakfast  and what  we call what day it is.
VDMA
Verbum domini manet in aeternum. The word of the Lord endures forever.
1 Peter 1:24-25, quoting Isaiah 40:6,8. Motto of the Lutheran Reformation.
Fayth onely justifieth before God. Robert Barnes, DD The Supplication, fourth essay. London: Daye, 1572.
Lord if Thou straightly mark our iniquity, who is able to abide Thy judgement? Wherefore I trust in no work that I ever did, but only in the death of Jesus Christ. I do not doubt, but through Him to inherit the kingdom of heaven. Robert Barnes, DD, before he was burnt alive for "heresy", 30 July 1540.
What is Luther? The doctrine is not mine, nor have I been crucified for anyone. Martin Luther, Dr. theol. (1522)
1 Peter 1:24-25, quoting Isaiah 40:6,8. Motto of the Lutheran Reformation.
Fayth onely justifieth before God. Robert Barnes, DD The Supplication, fourth essay. London: Daye, 1572.
Lord if Thou straightly mark our iniquity, who is able to abide Thy judgement? Wherefore I trust in no work that I ever did, but only in the death of Jesus Christ. I do not doubt, but through Him to inherit the kingdom of heaven. Robert Barnes, DD, before he was burnt alive for "heresy", 30 July 1540.
What is Luther? The doctrine is not mine, nor have I been crucified for anyone. Martin Luther, Dr. theol. (1522)
For the basics of our faith right here online, or for offline short daily prayer or devotion or study, scroll down to "A Beggar's Daily Portion" on the sidebar.
08 January 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

No comments:
Post a Comment