Now here's a hell of a guy.
Let's start where I started, long ago    in a galaxy far far away -- by which I mean, the preconciliar Roman    Catholic Church, which, there having been lots of councils to be pre-    to, means pre-Vatican II.
The Jerome Of My Younger Days.
Here's  what I recall from those days.    We used an official Bible in Latin,  and our English versions were made   from the Latin, and that Latin  Bible was the Latin translation of St   Jerome, often called the  Vulgate.  Protestants didn't do that.  They had   the King James Bible,  translated from Hebrew and Greek, not translated   from a translation  into Latin, and, it was claimed by those who  claimed  it, therefore  more accurate.
Not so, we were told, or at  least I  remember  being told.  St Jerome, for one thing, was a saint, a  term not  at  least as yet applicable to modern Biblical scholars.  And,  he was  much  closer in time to the Biblical, particularly the New  Testament,   authors, which meant his understanding of the languages was  more   immediate and not from scholarly studies centuries later.  And  also, he   worked from better sources than we have, including texts that  no  longer  exist.  Therefore, in using Jerome's Latin Bible, we are  using a  source  altogether more trustworthy than the much later sources  and  scholarship  of the Protestant Bibles translations.
The Historical Jerome versus The Jerome Of Faith.  
What's   ironic is, in his  own day, Jerome was highly controversial for using   the Hebrew text of  the Hebrew Bible, or Old Testament, as the Jewish   translation into Greek  called the Septuagint was considered the   normative and inspired text  for centuries going back to the   Greek-speaking early church, and whose  longer canon was the basis for   the Old Testament canon.
Fact is,  Jerome was controversial for a   hell of a lot more than that and was run  out of Rome!  Holy crap,   people jumped all over Jimmy Swaggart for  getting caught with a   prostitute, but that ain't nuttin compared to this  story.  Here it is.
Jerome   was born a pagan in a town called  Stridon, which was in the Roman   territory called Dalmatia.  The town no  longer exists because the Goths   trashed it in 379, and no-body knows  exactly where it was, except  that  it was in Dalmatia, which was more or  less modern Croatia and  Bosnia  and Slovenia.  As a young man he went to  Rome to pursue  classical  education, and by his own account pursue the  various  extra-curricular  activities often found in student life then as  now.   Somewhere along  the line he converted to Christianity and was   baptised.
After  some years in Rome he set out for France, well,   Gaul, and ended up in  Trier, which is among the most magnificent and   enchanting places it has  been my good fortune to visit, ever, anywhere.    Here in this most  wonderful place he seems to have taken up  theology.   Then about 373 or  so he sets out for what is now called the  Middle East,  particularly  Antioch, in what is now Turkey and one of  the oldest  centres of  Christianity.  It was there that he came to give  up secular  learning  altogether and focus on the Bible, learning  Hebrew from Jewish   Christians, and, apparently seized with remorse for  his past behaviour,   got into all sorts of ascetic penitential  practices.  Always a danger  --  the Good News just isn't news enough,  gotta have works!
The Ladies' Ear Tickler Enter the Story.
But   in  382 he goes back to Rome again, this time as assistant to Pope   Damasus  I.  Now there's another hell of a guy.  Man, papal elections   just ain't  what they used to be.  Twice over actually.  Once upon a   time, they were  a matter of the clergy and people of the area choosing a   bishop, or  overseer, with overseers from nearby areas confirming it.    But by this  time we have Constantine, and Christianity attaining   respectable  state-recognised status, and the Emperor confirmed newly   elected  bishops.  That's helpful because sometimes more than one guy   claimed to  be elected, sometimes in more than one election!
So   when Pope  Liberius, whom the Emperor Constantine had thrown out of   Rome, died on  24 September 366, one faction supported Ursinus, the   previous pope's  deacon, while another, which had previously supported a   rival pope,  Felix II, supported Damasus.  The patrician class, the  old  noble  families of Rome, supported Damasus, but the plebian class,  the  regular  folks, and the deacons supported Ursinus.  Each was  elected, in  separate  elections.  Some real apostolic succession there,  oh yeah.
It   gets worse.  There was outright rioting between  supporters of the two,   each side killing the other, so bad that the  prefects of the city had  to  be called on to restore order.  Damasus  got formally recognised, and   then his supporters commenced a slaughter  of 137 of Unsinus'  supporters,  right in a church.  Damasus was  accused of murder, and  hauled up on  charges before a later prefect,  but, being the favourite  of the wealthy  class, they bought the support  of the Emperor and got  Damasus off.   He  was known as Auriscalpius  Matronarum, the ladies' ear  scratcher.
Damasus  was "pope" from  366 until he died on 11  December 384.  During which  time, we have to  remember to really get  what was going on here, the  Emperors East and  West made the church as  headed by Damasus, and Peter  in Antioch, the  official state church and  the one recognised as  "catholic", in the  Edict of Thessalonica on 27  February 380, the  birthday of the Catholic  Church, as distinct from the  catholic church.   It was during Damasus'  papacy that the Emperor  Gratian. one of the  signatories to the Edict  of Thessalonica, refused  the traditional title  of pontifex maximus,  which then became associated  with the bishop of  Rome as the chief  priest of the Roman state  religion.  In sum, this is  the era of the  beginning of the Babylonian  Captivity of the Church  (Babylon of course  being a figure for Rome).
Back to the Historical Jerome.
So   in 382, when  Damasus calls Jerome back to Rome to help him shape   things up, what was  being shaped up was the new Catholic Church, the  new official state religion, which  by Imperial edict was  the only  church entitled to the name and all others  were heretics and  deserving  of such punishment as the Empire should  choose to inflict.  The  Western Roman  Empire at this time was starting to fall apart and was  just decades away from falling  apart, so a lot of this had to  do with  staving that off.
Jerome  was no slouch at matronly ear  tickling  himself, and once back soon had a  little group of wealthy  patrician  widows around him, whose money  supported him, a Paula in  particular.   And he had this ascetic  works-righteousness thing going,  into which he  got them all.  Nothing  like having lots of someone else's  money to  support you if you want a  monastic ascetic life.  Hell yes.
In   fact, the daughter of  Paula, a lively young woman named Blaesilla,   after just four months of  having to live this way, died!  Yeah, died.    On top of which Jerome  tells Paula not to mourn her daughter.  This  got  the Romans really  pissed, there was an inquiry into just what was  really  going on between  Jerome and Paula, and then Damasus dies, and  with that  support gone,  Jerome is forced out of Rome.
So  where's he go?   Where else, the  Eastern Empire, where they really get  into all this  monkery and  fasting and stuff.  Paula and her money  follow.  The whole  sham of a  works based sparse life funded by  patrician wealthy-class  money.   There's some real apostolic stuff for  you.  Lemme tell ya, if  somebody  wants to convince you of their  mistaking the physiological  effects of  self induced glucose denial for  some sort of spiritual state  of  attainment, you'd be better off  running right to the nearest  McDonald's  and ordering a double quarter  pounder, which, if memory  serves, is  combo 4 on the menu.  Personally I  like Arby's  or our  Nebraska favourite Runza better, which also makes a  helluva burger.  Wolgadeutsch too!
This sort of stuff is  not   self-denial, it's life denial.  Utterly pathological.  It is no curb    whatever to excess and greed, but is rather an equally odious extreme    reaction to it, both extremes equally devoid of the Gospel altogether.     It comes rather from an empire about to collapse under the tension of    its classic past and Christian present and efforts to reconcile them    within, with huge civil unrest in its wake, and threats from without in    the West.  Which was bad enough, but in the East, where it did not    collapse for another thousand years or so, it continued unabated, which    is equally bad.  The opposite of greed and excess is not this    pathological repression, but Judas H Priest, just eat a normal balanced    diet and go about a life of use to God and your fellow Man, stay in   your  parish where you find everything that made the saints saints, the   Word,  the Word preached, the Sacrament, and your fellow Christians.
The Word of the Lord Endures Forever -- Despite the "Church".
Well,    it would also be about a thousand years or so until THAT message got    out, little thing called the Lutheran Reformation, by a fellow  survivor   of the remnants of all this nonsense, guy named Martin  Luther.  Sorry  if  this stuff isn't in the sanitised reductive  biographical sketches  that  turn up in treasuries of prayer and stuff  like that, but them's  the  facts.  It's a disgusting pagan mess,  massacres, murders, politics,   scandals and all, and from the time of  Jerome's life on, the official   religion of the state held to be right  from the Apostles, which  remained  in the East, and remained in the  West after it reconstituted  itself as  the Holy Roman Empire, and  remains to this day in the former  state  churches that survive these  empires.
This is the world of  Augustine, Jerome, Damasus, etc --  the Western  Roman Empire, which  contains Rome, once the centre of the  whole thing,  in utter turmoil  between its classic philosophy, art,  culture and  religion and the new  religion, in attendant civil turmoil,  and under  assault from Germanic  forces outside it.  The sack of Rome  came in 410,  24 August to be  exact, by Alaric, King of the Visigoths.   The efforts to  synthesise  Rome's past and present failed utterly to  preserve Rome.   But it  created a state religion which survived the  death of the state  that  created it, became the one remaining link upon  which the new state   would be built, the Holy Roman Empire, and  survives to this day in the   West as the Roman Catholic Church as well  as other state churches, some   of them with the word Lutheran in them,  and most having now severed the   connexion to their modern state as  mandatory, and in the East as the   various Eastern Orthodox churches.
And  all of it based entirely  on the characteristics of this age, not in   the least on the Gospel, as a  dying empire tried to redefine itself for   survival -- hence "true"  churches, "apostolic succession", "bishops"  who  were as well state  officials and political powers, and all the  other  nonsense by which the  Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox  churches try  to justify themselves  and their pagan accretions which  would hold the  catholic church in  captivity until the Lutheran  Reformation, the need  for which was so  strong amid all this horse dung  and bullroar that later  "reforms" blew  right past the Lutheran  Reformation to an opposite but  equally bad  extreme, which to-day but  not originally travels under the  name  Protestant or Evangelical.
A  pope supported by the wealthy Roman  class in their twilight who kills   his opponents and becomes by edict of  the Emperor the true recipient  of  the true faith; a holy man whose I'd  better inflict all this on  myself  asceticism is funded by more wealthy  Roman class money and  kills the  daughter of his main supporter and  disgusts even the Romans.
So  what do we do then, forget about all  this as an unholy mess we  can  ignore and just get back to the Bible,  the "New Testament" church?    No.  And hell no.  Judas H Priest, the New  Testament church did not  have  the New Testament, so how ya gonna do  that?  You ain't.
Because  here's the thing, the Babylonian  Captivity was just that, a   captivity, not an extinction.  The catholic  church survived and   continues to survive even the invention of the  Catholic Church by the   Roman Empire.  And why is that?  Because of the  truth expressed in the   motto of the Lutheran Reformation, which motto  is simply Scripture   itself, both New and Old Testament.
VDMA.   Verbum Domini manet  in aeternum.  The Word of the Lord endures  forever.   It cannot be  overcome, and on its central truth about Jesus  Christ is  built the  church against which the gates of hell itself cannot   prevail, let  alone the Roman Empire.  It can survive power mongers like   Damasus and  pathological lunatics like Augustine and Jerome.
The Word of the Lord Endures Forever -- Despite Translators.
Particularly   Jerome.  His new Latin translation really did, even if the  work of a   nut case whose nuttiness was fatal and supposed self-denial  based on   the wealth of others, establish a better text of the Bible in  the most   widely understood language of its time and remained key in the    availability of the Bible for centuries to come, as that language became    the language of learning, and really did introduce, to a thoroughly    Gentilised Christianity with the barest of understandings of the Jewish    faith it fulfilled that had replaced it with reworkings in Christian    dress of its classic philosophy, a more Jewish understanding of the    texts, admired to this day by Jews, not to mention the Hebrew itself.
Not   only that, but Jerome set in motion a tradition of selections from    Scripture for reading at the preaching part if the Divine Service which    would continue for about 1,500 years, and still continues as what we   now  call the "historic" lectionary.  And why is it historic, because   it's,  well, old, you know, historic.  Hell no.  Because there's another   one  now, a product in the 1960s of that part of the church still in    Babylonian Captivity, a product of the last council there, Babylon II,    er, Vatican II.
The Western Roman Empire, under its new  Germanic  leaders, managed after a  few hundred years known as the Dark  Ages to  more or less reconstitute  itself as the Holy Roman Empire, and  the old  state church of the old  Roman Empire, the Catholic Church,  was right  there to take its place in  the whole set up.  Some consider  the HRE to  have begun with the  coronation -- by the "pope" of course  -- of  Charlemagne, Karl der  Grosse, in 800, as Emperor of the Romans,  and  some consider it to have  begun with the coronation -- by the  "pope" of  course -- of Otto on 2  February 962.  But in any case it  lasted for  about another 1,000 years,  and formally ended on 6 August  1806 at the  hands of Napoleon, with the  newly deposed last HRE,  Francis II, who  however continued as Francis I,  Emperor of Austria.   Francis hell, it  was Franz dammit, the only  Doppelkaiser in history.   Kaiser, that's a  Germanisation of guess what,  Caesar.  Doppel is  double.
But by  about 100 years after that, the underpinnings of  the Roman  Catholic  Church seemed even to many within it as wearing a  bit thin, the  Roman  Empire being long gone and now the Holy Roman  Empire being long  gone  too, and movements began in various circles,  some Scriptural, some   doctrinal, some liturgical, to re-express this  whole deal in terms not   so connected to things long gone.  So they set  about coming up with   something more attuned to the existentialism and  phenomenology then all   the rage.
A couple of problems with  that.  Once again, just as  in the time of  Jerome, Augustine, Damasus,  et al, we have an entity  trying to preserve  itself by merging its past  with its present and  future of different  origin.  But, that past was  exactly the product of  what was once the  different origin the last  time around.  IOW, that  church's Empire, both  of them, were gone and  now their church had to go  it alone in another  emerging new world and  once again it sought to  reinvent itself as a  synthesis, hybrid,  reconciliation, something like  that, of the two.   This culminated at  Vatican II, when the old Imperial  church reinvented  itself for a new  post-Imperial age.
Problem  is, the old Imperial church was just  that, the old Imperial  church, not  the catholic church or the church  of Jesus Christ, and one  of the two  elements being synthesised into a  new synthesis was itself a  previous  synthesis of Christianity and the  old empire.  Christianity,  the  catholic church, the church of Jesus  Christ, thought by the  proponents  of this movement to be re-emerging  after centuries of being  obscured,  was in fact being yet further  obscured; the Babylonian  Captivity  deepened, only re-expressed in  terms of the new Babylon that  no longer  had it as its church, or had a  church at all.
In this way it only  superficially resembled the  real reformation of the  church, which had  happened nearly five  centuries before already, with  such things as  vernacular languages,  free standing altars.  And so the  Whore of  Babylon thoroughly  remodelled the brothel, with a new order of  liturgy  (yeah, literally, a  novus ordo) complete with new calendar of   observances and new  lectionary of readings, replacing the one that had   grown for  centuries.
Now that's not surprising, that's what you  do when  you're the Whore of  Babylon, and the Babylon that formed you  and kept  you as its whore is  gone and there is a new Babylon.
But  these  came about on an entirely different basis than the reforms of   the  Reformation, which did not run from the march of history nor wish to    discard or disparage it for all its warts and blemishes, but accept it    and move on, not reinventing anything but continuing in continuity,    discarding only that which contradicted Scripture.
So what is   surprising is that the churches of the Reformation generally,  and even   those of the Lutheran Reformation, jumped on board with this  insanity,   took the novus ordo and revised and reworked their own  versions of  it!   And now we have an "historic" lectionary right  alongside a  Vatican II  For Lutherans Lutheranised version of this novus  ordo, even  leading the  Whore herself in this regard because we didn't  have to  wait a  generation or so for a Roman Imperial official with only a   church of  the former state left -- a "pope", in case you were wondering   -- to say  it's OK with a motu proprio!  Utter madness.
Conclusion.
So on this  feast of  St Jerome, let us remember that, you know what, he  really was  closer  to the authors and sources of the Bible than our  vaunted  modern  scholars working removed by centuries, and really did,  nut case  and  all, contribute to the church which even he and his   contemporaries and  times and subsequent times could put in captivity  but  not extinction, a  thing of great value in the Vulgate Bible and  the  tradition of the  historic lectionary.
And let us remember  that the  Reformation  has already happened and not at all on the basis  that  fuelled Babylon  II, er, Vatican II, and we continue as the  catholic  church where the  Word is rightly proclaimed and the  Sacraments rightly  administered, no  new faith, no new doctrine, no new  anything, and sure  as hell no new  orders of worship, based on the  scholarship emerging from  the  dissolution, not just politically but in  every way, of the Holy  Roman  Empire, in which there is no  "hermeneutic of continuity" whatever  but a  pathetic old whore trying  to still work the streets, but rather  the  organic continuity of the  catholic church normed by its very own  book,  the Bible, rejecting only  what contradicts it.
VDMA
Verbum domini manet in aeternum. The word of the Lord endures forever.
1 Peter 1:24-25, quoting Isaiah 40:6,8. Motto of the Lutheran Reformation.
Fayth onely justifieth before God. Robert Barnes, DD The Supplication, fourth essay. London: Daye, 1572.
Lord if Thou straightly mark our iniquity, who is able to abide Thy judgement? Wherefore I trust in no work that I ever did, but only in the death of Jesus Christ. I do not doubt, but through Him to inherit the kingdom of heaven. Robert Barnes, DD, before he was burnt alive for "heresy", 30 July 1540.
What is Luther? The doctrine is not mine, nor have I been crucified for anyone. Martin Luther, Dr. theol. (1522)
1 Peter 1:24-25, quoting Isaiah 40:6,8. Motto of the Lutheran Reformation.
Fayth onely justifieth before God. Robert Barnes, DD The Supplication, fourth essay. London: Daye, 1572.
Lord if Thou straightly mark our iniquity, who is able to abide Thy judgement? Wherefore I trust in no work that I ever did, but only in the death of Jesus Christ. I do not doubt, but through Him to inherit the kingdom of heaven. Robert Barnes, DD, before he was burnt alive for "heresy", 30 July 1540.
What is Luther? The doctrine is not mine, nor have I been crucified for anyone. Martin Luther, Dr. theol. (1522)
For the basics of our faith right here online, or for offline short daily prayer or devotion or study, scroll down to "A Beggar's Daily Portion" on the sidebar.
30 September 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


No comments:
Post a Comment