So why does the "birthday of the church" have the Greek prefix for fifty in it?
Because
Pentecost wasn't originally the birthday of the church, but an
observance commanded by God in the Law of Moses which is to be held
fifty days after the second day of Passover, with each day formally
counted.
The Original Pentecost In The Law Of Moses.
The
counting is called the Counting of the Omer. What's an omer? Omer are
the sheaves of a harvested crop. During the days of the physical
Temple, the priests would offer newly harvested barley on the second
day of Passover, which represents the start of the seven week harvest
season. Which is why Pentecost is also called the Feast of Weeks. In
the Law, Shavuot is called Hag ha-Katzir, the Holiday of Harvest's End.
Ah,
so we have a harvest festival, taking its place among the various
harvest festivals in world culture and religion. Well, yes and no. Yes,
it's another harvest festival, another instance of a human cause for
celebrating a human milestone, the end of the harvest, particularly in a
pre-industrial society. But there's something a little different about
this one.
The Talmud (what's a Talmud? -- ancient
rabbinical writings; for more, look it up, Wikipedia is linked to the
right of the page) says it was on the 6th of Sivan (a month in the
Jewish lunar calendar), which is the first night of Shavuot, that God
gave the Ten Words, better known among Gentiles as the Ten
Commandments. Consequently, a popular observance has been an all night
Bible study at home or in the synagogue, breaking for morning service,
called shakharit, the ancestor of our, well, morning service. This all
nighter is called tikkun.
Traditionally only dairy
foods are eaten on Shavuot, and while no-one knows why for sure, the
thinking is that on the first Shavuot they had slaughtered all these
animals for food but after the Law was given it turned out they were
not kosher so they only ate dairy foods.
In the
liturgy of the synagogue, the readings for the service for the first
day of Shavuot are: Torah portion Exodus 19:1 - 20:23 and Numbers
28:26-31; haftorah Ezechiel 1:1-28 and 3:12. In case you're a little
rusty, this is the Exodus account (actually the first of two Exodus
accounts, the other being Chapter 34, and there's another in
Deuteronomy) of the giving of the Law, specifically the Ten Words, and
Ezechiel's account of the chariot of fire -- you know, the flying
saucer.
This is the feast that Acts 2:1 (in the Epistle
for Pentecost, which even the Vatican II three year lectionary
couldn't overturn) refers to when it speaks of Pentecost arriving, and
why there were men from all over everywhere in Jerusalem for it. It's
to celebrate the giving of the Law, the whole reason why there was a
Passover and a deliverance, the most important event in Judaism. And
like Passover just had been, it was about to be transformed!
The Original Pentecost Transformed!
For
God himself had become Man in Jesus Christ, suffered the condemnation
for our sins in his death, and then rose again. Now, if this were all
to the story, why didn't he just stick around, proof positive that he
had risen? If the whole point were "All you need is Jesus", "I am saved
because Jesus died for my sins and rose again", "Jesus first, as long
as you believe that the rest isn't that important", then what would
make that point better, what would make that point more irrefutable,
than if he had stayed right here, so you could see him, talk to him
face to face, hear him teach, and say to those who don't believe "Look,
there he is right there, go ask him yourself".
But it
didn't happen that way, because that is not the whole point and not
all to the story. Just as the Passover and exodus from bondage in Egypt
had been not for its own sake but in order to gather with God so he
could give his people his Law, so the Passover of the full paschal lamb
Jesus had been not for its own sake but in order to gather with God so
he could give his people his Spirit! Just as God had commanded the
counting of the Omer, the fifty days connecting Pesach, Pascha, and
Shavuoth, Pentecost, so now God himself counts the Omer from the Pascha
of the Lamb he provided, his Son, to the Shavouth or Pentecost so that
on the very day where his people once celebrated only the giving of
the Law, they still celebrate that and added to it is the giving of the
Spirit!
And what happened as a result of that? His
Apostles, men who knew all you need is Jesus, men who knew for a
physical fact that Jesus had died and risen again, men who knew Jesus
is first, men who had all that and like any men on that basis alone
were scared and afraid and huddled around each other in the comfort of
others who had all that, tending to their prayers and the internal
matters of their little band, did something utterly amazing on this day
of celebrating the giving of the Law -- they gave the Law, and the
Gospel. Not only that, each one there heard it in his own language,
addressed directly to him!
And what did the people do?
Same as the Apostles had done when the women told them the tomb was
empty and he had risen. They didn't believe them. Some thought this is
just a foolish wishful story, others sought to figure out what this
means, others thought they're just crazy, probably drunk, out of their
minds. That's what happened first. Pretty much what still happens when
people hear the mighty works of God told to them -- when WE hear the
mighty works of God told to US. It's a really nice story stemming from
our deepest wishes; let's talk about this and dialogue as to what it
all means; those guys are crazy. That's what happened first. The rest
didn't happen until something else happened.
The Biggest Sign and Wonder Of Pentecost.
Peter
then stood with his brothers in the Office of Holy Ministry and laid
it right out for them, clean and clear. This is what Joel and David had
spoken about, Jesus delivered by the plan of God to us whom we in our
sinfulness abandoned the Law and in turn delivered him to the power and
law of the world to be killed, Jesus delivered by the power of God
from the power of death and our sinfulness which inflicted that on him,
Jesus risen again and now placed on the throne of David at the right
hand of God, Jesus having been given the promise of the Spirit so that
now you see and hear this: Therefore let all the house of Israel know
assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified,
both Lord and Christ.
That's the Law. And when they
heard the Law, given now for the first time in its fulfillment on this
day of celebrating the giving of the Law long ago, they were cut to the
heart. People by nature want a religion of works, stuff they can do to
make it all right, stuff they can do to feel OK with God, with each
other, and within themselves. And the world offers all sorts of
versions of that. Some of them go by the name Christianity. And the
feelings and purpose they impart are utterly false.
God
himself has shown us in the Law exactly the stuff he wants us to do,
and we showed ourselves absolutely incapable of it by our own reason
and strength, even in a scenario where there are but two people and one
commandment, even when a people is called and set apart to do the full
Mosaic Law and be an example to the nations, to the extent that we
handed his prophets and finally the One he sent over to the power of
our own ideas and law to be killed, and still reject their message to
this day.
So much for a religion of works. We can't do
it even when God himself shows us exactly how, no matter how hard we
try in purpose driven living or to attain our best life now. What's
worse, just like those on this Pentecost, we don't get it even when the
mighty works of God are directly addressed to us even with wondrous
signs, preferring instead to think it over or think they're just nuts!
Pentecost
came to-gether not in the signs and wonders, which can still leave us
in unbelief, but when Peter and his brothers in the Office of Holy
Ministry laid it out clean and clear. It still does. It was then, when
Peter had given the Law in its horrible consequences, that they, we,
thought not about what it all means, not let's think this over, not
maybe there's some good ideas here, not maybe these guys are nuts, but
instead were cut to the heart by the fruitlessness of their, our, own
reason and strength, and asked Peter and his brothers, Men and
brethren, what shall we do? It was then and only then that they could
tell them the Good News, the Gospel.
Repent,
and be baptised every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the
remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. For
the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar
off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.
What
happened then? Same thing that happens now. They that gladly received
his word were baptised, and they continued steadfastly in the apostles'
doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.
The Holy Ghost Church.
Guess
what! There's an emerging church all right. Not just lately, not out
of some marketing scheme supposedly crafted to the taste of the times,
but ever since the outpouring of the Spirit on that Pentecost whose
historical happening we celebrate every feast of Pentecost.
We
may not be in Jerusalem, the Temple is not physically there to go to
in one accord, and Peter and the other Apostles are not personally our
preachers. And it makes not the slightest difference. The taste of our
or any time has no taste for the Gospel and it is worthless to pander
to it thinking that will produce a taste for the Gospel. That will
produce only what it always produces -- a religion of works, stuff to
do to catch the God buzz in a quest after one's own feeling better, on
the surface all about Jesus or God but really all about me, or, a lot
of discussion about what it all means, or, a rejection of it as wishful
thinking at best and lunacy at worst.
What produces a
taste for the Gospel is the Law. That's why the Spirit was given to
proclaim the Gospel on the feast celebrating the giving of the Law! And
we have the reality of Pentecost before us no less than they. The
Temple is in ruins and Peter and the Apostles are gone. So how's that,
how is Pentecost not just another thing you read in a book that
supposedly comes from God, maybe it does, maybe it doesn't.
Because
the true Temple Jesus has been raised again on the third day, and has
taken his place with the Father, and has sent his Spirit as he
promised. And that Spirit speaks the same message to us as it did that
day in unbroken continuity and succession, not that Peter and the
Apostles are still physically here, not that other men are still here
in a succession of corporate hierarchy, not in those who produce signs
and wonders or miracles of church growth and attendance in his name,
but that the clean and clear laying out of Law and Gospel as was heard
that Pentecost continues to be heard in the faithful preaching of those
in the Office of Holy Ministry unto the ends of the earth despite sin,
the world and the gates of hell itself.
And when this
happens, the same thing follows as did then. Those who receive this
proclamation of Law and Gospel are baptised, they continue steadfastly
in the Apostles' teaching handed on in the church, especially in those
books upon which the church has said you can absolutely rely as the
inspired word of God without error, the Bible, and in preaching by
those called to do so of that Word, they continue steadfastly in
fellowship and community and gathering with each other, they continue
steadfastly in the breaking of the bread, the mass, the church's
liturgy, wherein Jesus was only fully discerned for who and what he is
even when he was bodily here for forty days after he rose, and they
continue steadfastly in prayer.
Conclusion.
That
is the gift of the Holy Ghost, and every bit of it is as available
here and now as it was on that day we read about in Acts, in the
Epistle or Christian haftorah for Pentecost, every bit of what was
pointed to in Ezechiel's chariot of fire we read about in the original
Pentecost haftorah. Pentecost comes to-gether, despite all our vain and
sinful efforts to make it happen in some other way more to our liking,
the same now as then as ever. Accept no substitute! There is no
substitute, even if it claims his name or produces signs and wonders
and warm feelings in his name, as true and false teachers and even
Satan himself alike can do!
Pentecost is about the one thing they cannot produce and only the true Spirit of God can. As the Little Catechism explains:
I
believe in the Holy Ghost; the holy Christian church; the communion of
Saints; the forgiveness of sins; the resurrection of the body; and the
life everlasting.
Amen.
What does
this mean? I believe that I cannot by my own reason or strength believe
in Jesus Christ, my Lord, or come to Him; but the Holy Ghost has
called me by the Gospel, enlightened me with his gifts, sanctified and
kept me in the true faith; even as He calls, gathers, enlightens, and
sanctifies the whole Christian church on earth, and keeps it with Jesus
Christ in the one true faith; in which Christian church He daily and
richly forgives all sins to me and all believers, and will at the Last
Day raise up me and all the dead, and give unto me and all believers in
Christ eternal life.
This is most certainly true.
VDMA
Verbum domini manet in aeternum. The word of the Lord endures forever.
1 Peter 1:24-25, quoting Isaiah 40:6,8. Motto of the Lutheran Reformation.
Fayth onely justifieth before God. Robert Barnes, DD The Supplication, fourth essay. London: Daye, 1572.
Lord if Thou straightly mark our iniquity, who is able to abide Thy judgement? Wherefore I trust in no work that I ever did, but only in the death of Jesus Christ. I do not doubt, but through Him to inherit the kingdom of heaven. Robert Barnes, DD, before he was burnt alive for "heresy", 30 July 1540.
What is Luther? The doctrine is not mine, nor have I been crucified for anyone. Martin Luther, Dr. theol. (1522)
1 Peter 1:24-25, quoting Isaiah 40:6,8. Motto of the Lutheran Reformation.
Fayth onely justifieth before God. Robert Barnes, DD The Supplication, fourth essay. London: Daye, 1572.
Lord if Thou straightly mark our iniquity, who is able to abide Thy judgement? Wherefore I trust in no work that I ever did, but only in the death of Jesus Christ. I do not doubt, but through Him to inherit the kingdom of heaven. Robert Barnes, DD, before he was burnt alive for "heresy", 30 July 1540.
What is Luther? The doctrine is not mine, nor have I been crucified for anyone. Martin Luther, Dr. theol. (1522)
For the basics of our faith right here online, or for offline short daily prayer or devotion or study, scroll down to "A Beggar's Daily Portion" on the sidebar.
23 May 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Dear Vorsteher, I have been looking forward to reading your Pentecost posting, and now, having read it, I am a little puzzled.
You quote Peter on Pentecost, “Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.” Then, in your conclusion you write, “That is the gift of the Holy Ghost, and every bit of it is as available here and now as …”, referring to the previous paragraph. Does that mean that it is not the Holy Spirit Himself Who is given to all believers, but a gift of His, concerning which Peter does not elaborate?
Frieden und Freude!
George A. Marquart
The gift of the Holy Ghost is exactly as the Small Catechism explains.
Thank you, Past Elder.
English has its complexities. When you write “the gift of the Holy Ghost”, that definite article says that it is a particular gift. Or, it could mean that the Holy Ghost Himself is the gift. The Small Catechism, on the other hand, only uses the plural, “gifts”. So the Small Catechism explains about “gifts”, not “the gift”. Is there any difference? Do you see my quandary?
If Peter indeed meant that the gift was the Holy Spirit Himself, dwelling in each believer, the Small Catechism does not explain that anywhere, to the best of my knowledge.
Please don’t be angry with me, and don’t even feel you should respond to this.
Peace and Joy!
George A. Marquart
Any language, especially written, has its imprecisions, and that is a classic problem since the old Greeks.
So yes, is the Holy Spirit himself the gift, or does he bring another, but singular gift, or what?
I still hold the Catechism explains it all. What is says is the gift of the Holy Spirit. The singular is collective -- so whether one takes it as the Holy Spirit himself, or takes it as the Holy Spirit as we experience it variously, it is the same, it is what the Catechism states.
Your blog is really very interesting and appreciative.You should write more so that we get more to read such blogs.Thanks for sharing!!!!!
elderly care
Post a Comment